I'm very happy with an extra $3,000 a year in rates if my rental income goes up by $1,000 a week.
On 28 January 2011 18:16, Rog & Reet <[email protected]> wrote: > Quadruple the rich git’s rates in the Eastern suburbs. > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Friday, 28 January 2011 5:47 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Flood levy [sec=unclassified] > > > > Excellent idea. Then no new homes will ever get built and my house will > escalate in value. I'll be able to move back to the UK and live off the rent > on my place. > > > > It's not like you to have an idea that so favours those who have lots and > punishes those who have little but it's nice that you're finally coming > round. > > On 28 January 2011 09:54, Rog & Reet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Slap a 99% tax on all property developers. > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT > *Sent:* Friday, 28 January 2011 9:27 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Flood levy [sec=unclassified] > > > > As someone said to me yesterday, the people who give planning permission to > build homes or businesses in flood prone areas should take some blame so > right back to the government. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Jeremy Tonks > *Sent:* Friday, 28 January 2011 08:09 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Flood levy > > I was half hoping no one would raise this nasty. You’re right. And many of > them are uninsured because they live in flood prone areas and are, > therefore, by definition uninsurable. But what do you do when everything you > have, house and possessions, is destroyed. A $15,000 handout from the govt > won’t do a great deal… > > > > It must also be very frustrating for people who have been in isolated > pockets of flooding (6 to 20 homes effected – like in the Illawarra floods > in the late 90’s) over the last 20 years to see the amount of money flowing > in when they got very little to nothing. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *mark worrall > *Sent:* Friday, 28 January 2011 9:00 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Flood levy > > > > I guess the lesson is dont waste your money paying for insurance as the > council will pay through a relief fund, and the govt will levy money, from > those who did pay for insurance (and who paid higher premiums because of > those who took the risk and didnt get insurance and got burned). Same > happened with the NSW bushfires. > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Marcus Chantry < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Had to laugh at this comment that someone put up on the SMH website about > the flood levy: > > > > *So.... swany and co blow the surplus on dodgy insulation schemes and > throwing $900 to dead people, non australians and bogans to buy a plasma > tele's, smokes and pokies and then demand everyone pay it back because > suddenly the kitty is bare for infrastructure rebuilding? Priceless economic > mismanagement by a group of labor hacks that have never even run a school > canteen* > > > > The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the > intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this > email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee > the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions > expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of > Macquarie. > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
