If we played like we did against Man Utd every week, were top of the table and 
signed Fernando Torres rather than Marcus Bent, I'd be most happy.

________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 11 February 2011 10:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BTMO] McCarthy

Let me ask all the nay-sayers.

What would it take for you to change your mind about Mick?

What position in the league would we need to finish in?
What sorts of players should he be buying?
What should change about the style of football?

For example:

"If we played like we did against Manure every week, were tenth in the table 
and signed X rather than Y, I'd be willing to support him as the manager."
On 11 February 2011 10:44, Marcus Chantry 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Careful Mark.  It seems that QLD air has magical properties and you're in 
danger of turning into a Happy Clapper.

The results so far this year, in my mind, seem to suggest that it is the 
players themselves who are lifting for the big games almost as if they want to 
prove that they are Premier League quality.  But when it comes to the lesser 
games they don't have that same desire or commitment.  So to me that suggests 
that Mick has no influence what so ever over the players.  If he was able to 
make the team better than the sum of the parts then we should be performing 
more consistently and getting results against our direct competitors, not only 
the big clubs that inspire the players.


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf 
Of mark worrall
Sent: Friday, 11 February 2011 10:38 AM

To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [BTMO] McCarthy

"he is tactically canny and adept at making a team more than the sum of its 
parts"

in my opinion, this sums up why we aren't already relegated, because i don't 
think our squad is really much better than a good Championship one. Certainly 
not good enough to beat Man City, Chelsea, Liverpool or Man Utd. I also 
remember he got Ireland a lot further through the World Cup than they should 
have. He deserves a lot of credit for getting 110% out of players.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Marcus Chantry 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Maybe that's our problem, it's not that Mick is thick and rubbish at his job, 
it's just that he's misunderstood.


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf 
Of mark worrall
Sent: Friday, 11 February 2011 10:28 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [BTMO] McCarthy

"since they were promoted in 2009, Wanderers have been a revelation, using 
combative midfielders, pacy wingers and shrewd buys to forge a team whose work 
ethic, spirit and skill have made them a credit to a much-maligned and 
misunderstood manager". woohoo.


On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Marcus Chantry 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
For those of you who don't get the Fiver, here is a piece about McCarthy.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/blog/2011/feb/09/mick-mccarthy-barnsley-wolverhampton-wanderers


The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the 
integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are 
the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.


--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!


--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

Before printing, please consider the environment.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be 
read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally 
privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by 
any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any 
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in 
this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the 
views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately 
delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy 
or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. 

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

Reply via email to