I'll lose my faith in Mick when: - Bottom half of the Championship. - Buys old has-beens with no sell on value rather than young, fit upcoming players - Not bothered about the football for now. I'd rather we hoof the ball if it means we can establish in the Prem rather than go down playing pretty football like the sh1t under Pulis
On 11 February 2011 11:29, Rog & Reet <[email protected]> wrote: > a) He had some ideas of his own. For instance, last season he thought > copying Pulis, signing Halford and The Neck, would keep us up. > > b) 7th not bloody 17th. > > c) More players who can pass a ball, not the headless chooks he so favours. > > d) Everything, he’s too scared of losing. Doyle, Jarvis and Hunt seem to be > in the team more to protect the defence than score. > > STOP PASSING THE ****ING BALL BACK TO THE ****ING GOALIE TO HOOF THE > ****ING THING UPFIELD AFTER EVERY ****ING KICK OFF. > > > > Now perhaps you can show us how you answered those questions. > > Really looking forward to your a) answer. > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Friday, 11 February 2011 10:51 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] McCarthy > > > > Let me ask all the nay-sayers. > > > > What would it take for you to change your mind about Mick? > > > > What position in the league would we need to finish in? > > What sorts of players should he be buying? > > What should change about the style of football? > > > > For example: > > > > "If we played like we did against Manure every week, were tenth in the > table and signed X rather than Y, I'd be willing to support him as the > manager." > > On 11 February 2011 10:44, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Careful Mark. It seems that QLD air has magical properties and you’re in > danger of turning into a Happy Clapper. > > > > The results so far this year, in my mind, seem to suggest that it is the > players themselves who are lifting for the big games almost as if they want > to prove that they are Premier League quality. But when it comes to the > lesser games they don’t have that same desire or commitment. So to me that > suggests that Mick has no influence what so ever over the players. If he > was able to make the team better than the sum of the parts then we should be > performing more consistently and getting results against our direct > competitors, not only the big clubs that inspire the players. > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *mark worrall > *Sent:* Friday, 11 February 2011 10:38 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] McCarthy > > > > "he is tactically canny and adept at making a team more than the sum of > its parts" > > > > in my opinion, this sums up why we aren't already relegated, because i > don't think our squad is really much better than a good Championship one. > Certainly not good enough to beat Man City, Chelsea, Liverpool or Man Utd. I > also remember he got Ireland a lot further through the World Cup than they > should have. He deserves a lot of credit for getting 110% out of players. > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Marcus Chantry < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe that’s our problem, it’s not that Mick is thick and rubbish at his > job, it’s just that he’s misunderstood. > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *mark worrall > *Sent:* Friday, 11 February 2011 10:28 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] McCarthy > > > > "since they were promoted in 2009, Wanderers have been a revelation, using > combative midfielders, pacy wingers and shrewd buys to forge a team whose > work ethic, spirit and skill have made them a credit to a much-maligned and > misunderstood manager". woohoo. > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Marcus Chantry < > [email protected]> wrote: > > For those of you who don’t get the Fiver, here is a piece about McCarthy. > > > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/blog/2011/feb/09/mick-mccarthy-barnsley-wolverhampton-wanderers > > > > The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the > intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this > email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee > the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions > expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of > Macquarie. > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
