a) He had some ideas of his own. For instance, last season he thought
copying Pulis, signing Halford and The Neck, would keep us up.
b) 7th not bloody 17th.
c) More players who can pass a ball, not the headless chooks he so favours.
d) Everything, he's too scared of losing. Doyle, Jarvis and Hunt seem to be
in the team more to protect the defence than score.
STOP PASSING THE ****ING BALL BACK TO THE ****ING GOALIE TO HOOF THE
****ING THING UPFIELD AFTER EVERY ****ING KICK OFF.
Now perhaps you can show us how you answered those questions.
Really looking forward to your a) answer.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 11 February 2011 10:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BTMO] McCarthy
Let me ask all the nay-sayers.
What would it take for you to change your mind about Mick?
What position in the league would we need to finish in?
What sorts of players should he be buying?
What should change about the style of football?
For example:
"If we played like we did against Manure every week, were tenth in the table
and signed X rather than Y, I'd be willing to support him as the manager."
On 11 February 2011 10:44, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]>
wrote:
Careful Mark. It seems that QLD air has magical properties and you're in
danger of turning into a Happy Clapper.
The results so far this year, in my mind, seem to suggest that it is the
players themselves who are lifting for the big games almost as if they want
to prove that they are Premier League quality. But when it comes to the
lesser games they don't have that same desire or commitment. So to me that
suggests that Mick has no influence what so ever over the players. If he
was able to make the team better than the sum of the parts then we should be
performing more consistently and getting results against our direct
competitors, not only the big clubs that inspire the players.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Friday, 11 February 2011 10:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BTMO] McCarthy
"he is tactically canny and adept at making a team more than the sum of its
parts"
in my opinion, this sums up why we aren't already relegated, because i don't
think our squad is really much better than a good Championship one.
Certainly not good enough to beat Man City, Chelsea, Liverpool or Man Utd. I
also remember he got Ireland a lot further through the World Cup than they
should have. He deserves a lot of credit for getting 110% out of players.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Marcus Chantry
<[email protected]> wrote:
Maybe that's our problem, it's not that Mick is thick and rubbish at his
job, it's just that he's misunderstood.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Friday, 11 February 2011 10:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BTMO] McCarthy
"since they were promoted in 2009, Wanderers have been a revelation, using
combative midfielders, pacy wingers and shrewd buys to forge a team whose
work ethic, spirit and skill have made them a credit to a much-maligned and
misunderstood manager". woohoo.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Marcus Chantry
<[email protected]> wrote:
For those of you who don't get the Fiver, here is a piece about McCarthy.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/blog/2011/feb/09/mick-mccarthy-barnsley-wolv
erhampton-wanderers
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
