So true. Morris, Chantry, Cooper. Get ready for it. On 26 October 2011 15:37, mark worrall <markworr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lol. Same culprits who from day 1 wanted McGhee out, Hoddle out, David > Jones out and whoever is next out. > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Steven Millward > <millward....@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I now want him to be sacked, us get a rubbish manager in, get relegated >> and struggle to get back up for twenty years. I shall blame all of you lot >> for hounding him out. And I shall do it every day on this email. >> >> You're all responsible. >> >> On 26 October 2011 14:17, Paul Crowe <pcr...@contechengineering.com>wrote: >> >>> A defeat tonight, followed by another at Maine Road and Wigan at home >>> will see the end of MM!**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Fingers crossed! If Morgan thought some fans were hostile on Saturday, he >>> hasn’t seen anything yet. I remember being at the Mol for McGee’s last game, >>> the whole ground shook with vicious “McGee Out” chants! **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> I’ve had enough of him and his excuses for the football we haven’t been >>> playing for a while now. ** >>> >>> * * >>> >>> Paul Crowe**** >>> >>> Sales Manager - Asia Pacific**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> ConTech (Sydney Office)**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> PO Box 3517**** >>> >>> Rhodes Waterside**** >>> >>> Rhodes NSW 2138**** >>> >>> Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542**** >>> >>> Mob: 0406009562**** >>> >>> Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com**** >>> >>> Website: www.contechengineering.com**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 26 October 2011 12:18 PM >>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> You've changed your argument there, but my point was is that comparing >>> Wolves with those sides is specious reasoning.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> In addressing your new argument, we have at the moment a team at the top >>> of the bottom quartile of the PL, which you admitted is where we should be >>> with the squad we have. That we haven't spent more to get a bigger squad is >>> not Mick's fault.**** >>> >>> On 26 October 2011 11:16, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> Quality of players is certainly a big part of it but nobody has ever >>> suggested that we should be able to compete with the likes of Man City, Man >>> Utd, Arsenal etc, but surely Mick must take some responsibility for the >>> squad that he has built and the tactics that he employs.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> He’s spent 5 years rebuilding the team from scratch, there have been >>> wholesale changes behind the scenes with management and coaching staff, >>> introduction of more technology to monitor training and match performance. >>> We have a new owner that is investing in infrastructure and to some extent >>> players, yet what have we been able to show for it so far *this season*? >>> We have just been outplayed and dominated by a team in their first ever >>> season in top flight football, who 3 seasons ago were playing league 1 >>> football. We were also very poor against QPR at home and West Brom. ** >>> ** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> The team that Mick built isn’t performing to the standard that many think >>> they should be after 3 years in the Premier League; surely Mick is largely >>> responsible for that? Him, Jez & Morgan said they were aiming for mid-table >>> this season. Do you think we are performing well enough to get mid-table? >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 October 2011 9:40 PM **** >>> >>> >>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Is this an issue of the quality of the players more than the manager's >>> ability? >>> >>> For example, Silva and Milner each cost about as much as our entire >>> team. Silva's wages are 140k a week which is about 5 of our players. >>> >>> No. Of course not. It's all Mick's fault**** >>> >>> **** >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>> Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 October 2011 1:35 PM >>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves]**** >>> >>> The glaringly obvious difference between the teams being compared is that >>> almost their entire 25 man squads are “complete” players than have the >>> ability to defend, attack, pass, cross, head a ball and cover other players >>> when they go wandering.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Unfortunately, we don’t have 1 player in our 25 man squad who can do >>> anything other than play the position they were brought up to play (usually >>> via the lower tiers of English football).**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Is it any wonder that players like Silva & Milner can wonder around as >>> they wish when their team mates can easily slot in to any position and cover >>> their wondering? Can you imagine Jarvis trying to slot into right-back if >>> Stearman goes wondering around the pitch? Not a chance as he has no >>> positional awareness or ability to tackle. This is the case for almost >>> every position in our team. Mick is old school and buys/trains players to >>> perform single functions, which is why so many of them look like square pegs >>> in round holes when he tries to use someone to fill a position through >>> injury. The style of players and the coaching methods used by the newer >>> bread of coaches (Barca, City, Real Madrid etc) are polar opposites to the >>> thinking of Barnsley lad McCarthy.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 October 2011 1:22 PM >>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Interesting article on "tactics".**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> >>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thefootballtacticsblog/2011/10/silva_and_milner_add_guts_and.html >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 25 October 2011 13:10, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> No way!!! Mick McCarthy really is Mick The Magician compared to that >>> prat Sven. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> It seems Mick is going to be given the opportunity to rectify the current >>> slump and keep us in the Premier League so lets see whether he is smart >>> enough to try different tactics and team selections or whether he’s going to >>> be pig-headed and persist with the same drivel. If we are going to change >>> back to a 4-5-1 I think he needs to move Doyle into the hole behind a >>> striker. Doyle is good at holding up the ball and creating space for other >>> players but he is not a natural goalscorer (last weeks tap-in was not of his >>> own making).**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Two hammerings from Man City in a week should be a good test for the fans >>> and also Mick’s temperament. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 October 2011 1:05 PM **** >>> >>> >>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I wonder if that is just a longer-term example of "he has the full >>> support of the board"**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Sven is free now. Is he the man to consolidate us?**** >>> >>> On 25 October 2011 12:45, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> At the end of the day, I don’t think it really matters how much the fans >>> complain. Steve Morgan categorically stated at the start of the season that >>> even if Wolves were relegated, Mick would remain the manager. End of as far >>> as he’s concerned.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 October 2011 12:35 PM **** >>> >>> >>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I think the point is that an experienced footbal manager knows more about >>> football than anyone in the crows, although most people don't agree with >>> that.**** >>> >>> On 25 October 2011 08:44, LEESE Matthew <matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> Sky must have failed to pan the crowd if the fella who wrote this >>> believes McCarthy was getting stick from a minority.**** >>> >>> **** >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward**** >>> >>> *Sent:* Monday, 24 October 2011 8:04 PM **** >>> >>> >>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Here you are, you spotty kids. >>> >>> http://www.skysports.com/story/0,,12040_7260955,00.html**** >>> >>> "But Mick then makes a couple of substitutions and the cameras focused on >>> a bunch of spotty kids on the terraces. Basically their attitude was 'you >>> don't know what you're doing' - foul-mouthed abuse of these substitutions >>> which in fact coincided with the turning of this game in Wolves' favour. >>> **** >>> >>> "Of course he knew what he was doing! Why would they be standing on the >>> terraces and doing some other job and Mick be a Premier League manager - a >>> manager of one of the top 20 clubs in one of the top football countries in >>> the world if he didn't know more about what he was doing than they do?** >>> ** >>> >>> "People don't know their place anymore. This is the problem. People who >>> don't know anything are shouting 'you don't know what you're doing' to a >>> chap who quite demonstrably does know football inside out."**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 24 October 2011 08:44, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote:*** >>> * >>> >>> The bloke's a blowhard, his offer to fight fans was made in front of >>> reporters without a fan in sight. >>> If ever there was a time to offer someone outside it was when Keane >>> slagged >>> him off to his face. >>> Of course he never uttered a word. >>> >>> As for a new manager I'd go for that Ferguson bloke. >>> He'll be after another job if his team carry on performing like they did >>> this morning.**** >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>> Behalf**** >>> >>> Of Paul Crowe >>> Sent: Monday, 24 October 2011 8:32 AM**** >>> >>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: RE: [NSWolves] >>> >>> MM on his way out, lost the plot big time! >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/wolverhampton-wanderers/8844 >>> >>> 020/Wolverhampton-Wanderers-manager-Mick-McCarthy-tells-fans-he-is-up-for-a- >>> fight-following-protests.html<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/wolverhampton-wanderers/8844%0A020/Wolverhampton-Wanderers-manager-Mick-McCarthy-tells-fans-he-is-up-for-a-%0Afight-following-protests.html> >>> >>> Offering to fight the fans? MM has totally lost in my opinion. >>> >>> Who do you fancy as our next Manager Rog? Another one to add to the list >>> could be that Paul Lambert from Norwich, they have tried to play football >>> all season so far. >>> >>> >>> Paul Crowe >>> Sales Manager - Asia Pacific >>> >>> ConTech (Sydney Office) >>> >>> PO Box 3517 >>> Rhodes Waterside >>> Rhodes NSW 2138 >>> Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 >>> Mob: 0406009562 >>> Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com >>> Website: www.contechengineering.com >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>> Behalf >>> Of Rog & Reet >>> Sent: Sunday, 23 October 2011 12:44 PM >>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: RE: [NSWolves] >>> >>> Sounds like you set the alarm for the wrong time and have mistaken >>> Norwich >>> for us. >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>> Behalf >>> Of Steven Millward >>> Sent: Sunday, 23 October 2011 11:40 AM >>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] >>> >>> I watched it this morning. I thought we played very well. No complaints. >>> Some really good performances and a lot of bad luck again. >>> >>> On 23/10/2011, at 9:45 AM, "Marcus Chantry" < >>> marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > If you had sat and watched the match I can guarantee that your reaction >>> would be different Steve. I can see how waking up and seeing a 2-2 result >>> might be seen as a positive because it's not a loss, but trust me the two >>> late goals simply mask the fact that we were rubbish for 84 minutes. >>> > >>> > Molineux was about to be torn to shreds by the fans (those who were >>> still >>> there) but the late goals quelled that a bit. It still can't hide the >>> fact >>> that we were completely outclassed at home by a newly promoted team. It >>> was >>> only the bringing on of Milijas (and some other bloke) that made any >>> difference and we stuck with the 442 formation with the subs. >>> > >>> > >>> > ----- Original Message ----- >>> > From: Steven Millward [mailto:millward....@gmail.com] >>> > Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 05:36 AM >>> > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> >>> > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] >>> > >>> > It's all gone downhill since he took your advice and played 442 >>> > >>> > On 22/10/2011, at 11:43 PM, "Rog & Reet" <rognr...@exemail.com.au> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Kept the faith even after two back passes for Hennessey to hoof >>> upfield >>> >> inside the first 60 seconds. >>> >> Mick'll get us out of this, he knows what he's doing. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -----Original Message----- >>> >> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>> Behalf >>> >> Of Marcus Chantry >>> >> Sent: Saturday, 22 October 2011 11:37 PM >>> >> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> >> Subject: [NSWolves] >>> >> >>> >> I'm so glad Mick is our manager. Keep the faith. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are >>> not >>> the >>> >> intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in >>> this >>> >> email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not >>> guarantee >>> >> the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions >>> >> expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or >>> opinions >>> of >>> >> Macquarie. >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This >>> e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the >>> named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged >>> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any >>> mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any >>> unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed >>> in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily >>> the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please >>> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not >>> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended >>> recipient. **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This >>> e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the >>> named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged >>> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any >>> mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any >>> unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed >>> in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily >>> the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please >>> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not >>> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended >>> recipient. **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
