UNCLASSIFIED

A bit late.
 
Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies


apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand.  some sort of
protest demanding Mick's head. 

On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:


        I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. 

        On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:


                
                Should have been 6
                
                From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
                Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM
                To: [email protected]
                Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
                sorry, 5 at home.
                On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:


                so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to
concede 4 at home?
                On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:


                Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at
all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. 
                -- 
                Boo! Thick Mick Out.
                -- 
                Boo! Thick Mick Out.
                -- 
                Boo! Thick Mick Out.

                -- 
                Boo! Thick Mick Out.



        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out.
        


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

Reply via email to