I really can't see how Morgan has any other option. MM must go. He has been amazingly loyal to him but he just can't cut it. Time for some new ideas, even if we go down, MM has had more than enough chances.
Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra -----Original Message----- From: Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:50:41 To: <nswolves@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how anyone can say we lack pace. I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of the night has anything to do with it. Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing isn't it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick and Morgan said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it was unrealistic to think we'd improve much. On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to > watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means > you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our > ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who > felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were > fighting amongst themselves. > > After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there > would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress this > season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of progress so > people should be entitled to criticize. > > However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line with > our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, even if > progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon > during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We > thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this > year. So what? > > It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of the > Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and > support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem > Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment > > > > > On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA > <jpar...@munichre.com>wrote: > >> I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now.**** >> >> Really don’t give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse.**** >> >> Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> ------------------------------ >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >> Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM >> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *UNCLASSIFIED***** >> >> A bit late.**** >> >> **** >> >> Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of >> Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act >> 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to >> contact the sender and delete the email.**** >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >> Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 >> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** >> >> apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of >> protest demanding Mick's head. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** >> >> >> >> **** >> >> I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:**** >> >> >> >> **** >> >> Should have been 6**** >> >> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >> Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM >> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** >> >> sorry, 5 at home.**** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** >> >> >> >> >> **** >> >> so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at >> home?**** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:**** >> >> >> >> >> **** >> >> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence >> to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> ------------------------------ >> CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is >> confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended >> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may >> be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group >> will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. >> Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where >> the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the >> Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action >> taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this >> message. >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
