Remember Paul, the NSWolves archive never forgets our mistakes. Paul Crowe [email protected] via googlegroups.com 23/12/2011 to nswolves
Simple Jeremy, Mark Hughes, the best candidate available who is not currently in a job. Can’t see the Board forking out millions to poach someone from elsewhere. An outsider, who would change things dramatically, albeit what Dr. Milward thinks, is Carlo Ancelotti. *Paul CroweSales Manager - * On 14 February 2012 08:10, paul <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > Never with Hughes Steve, my first choice was O'Neill. > Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra > ------------------------------ > *From: *Steven Millward <[email protected]> > *Sender: *[email protected] > *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:03:10 +1100 > *To: *<[email protected]> > *ReplyTo: *[email protected] > *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > > Didn't you align yourself with Mark Hughes on a number of occasions? I > hear he's doing rubbish at QPR, albeit with lots of money. > > > > On 14 February 2012 07:10, paul <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Morgan will have someone lined up, just hope it is not Curbishley. I >> would take Kevin Keegan until the end of the season! >> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> >> *Sender: *[email protected] >> *Date: *Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:46:29 +1100 >> *To: *<[email protected]> >> *ReplyTo: *[email protected] >> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >> >> does anyone think we'd have a chance of enticing Gus Poyet away from >> Brighton? >> >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:43 PM, Paul Hart wrote: >> >> Make em put a shift in !!!! >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:40 PM, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> In reality though I don't think we're going to attract the type of >> manager who wants to play "attractive" football. There simply aren't the >> type of players in our squad to play that style. We need a manager who can >> motivate grafters. >> >> >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:37 PM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >> >> Has Dave Jones got himself another job yet? >> >> There's a Manager called Mark McGhee who gets good wraps at Bristol >> Rovers. >> >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:24 PM, Paul Hart wrote: >> >> Sorry meant to say Graham turner >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:16 PM, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Stuart Pearce? christ almighty, Bring back Mick!! >> >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:14 PM, Paul Hart wrote: >> >> Stuart Pearce >> Alan curbishley >> Grahame souness >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:11 PM, Steven Millward <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I'd like to see if any of you are brave enough to put three realistic >> names down as replacements >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:07 PM, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> He's GONE!!!!! >> >> >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 22:04 , Steven Millward wrote: >> >> Clipboard in charge. Lol >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, "Jeremy Tonks" < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Another sad watershed in my long Wolves hair shirt experience. I >> watched this morning (and genuinely wished I hadn’t). It is the first time >> I have EVER watched Wolves and wished I hadn’t.**** >> >> Frankly it was embarrassing. Hennessy was the stand out (and he had one >> clanger). Johnston hopefully got an assist for one goal (he’s in my >> fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas?**** >> >> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the first >> half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the second and got >> absolutely flogged.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I don’t care if we had >> Tevez and Ronaldo up front – they’d catch cold.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> I’m not for changing managers – but I soon will be L**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* <[email protected]>[email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM >> *To:* <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >> >> ** ** >> >> I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how >> anyone can say we lack pace. >> >> I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of the >> night has anything to do with it. >> >> Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing >> isn't it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick and >> Morgan said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it was >> unrealistic to think we'd improve much. >> >> >> **** >> >> On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry < >> <[email protected]><[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote:**** >> >> I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to >> watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means >> you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our >> ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who >> felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were >> fighting amongst themselves.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there >> would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress this >> season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of progress so >> people should be entitled to criticize. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line >> with our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, even >> if progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. >> >> Sent from my iPhone**** >> >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward < >> <[email protected]><[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote:**** >> >> Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon >> during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We >> thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this >> year. So what?**** >> >> **** >> >> It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of >> the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and >> support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem >> Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> >> **** >> >> On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA >> <<[email protected]><[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote:**** >> >> I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now.**** >> >> Really don’t give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse.**** >> >> Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans.**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> ------------------------------ >> >> **** >> >> *From:* <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> [email protected] [mailto: >> <[email protected]><[email protected]> >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM >> *To:* <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> [email protected] >> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >> >> **** >> >> *UNCLASSIFIED***** >> >> A bit late.**** >> >> **** >> >> Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men**** >> >> **** >> >> *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of >> Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act >> 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to >> contact the sender and delete the email.**** >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> [email protected] [mailto: >> <[email protected]><[email protected]> >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 >> *To:* <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** >> >> apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of >> protest demanding Mick's head. **** >> >> **** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** >> >> ** ** >> >> I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. **** >> >> **** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Should have been 6**** >> >> *From:* <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> [email protected] [mailto: >> <[email protected]><[email protected]> >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM >> *To:* <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** >> >> sorry, 5 at home.**** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** >> >> >> >> **** >> >> so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at >> home?**** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:**** >> >> >> >> **** >> >> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence >> to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> ** ** >> ------------------------------ >> >> CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is >> confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended >> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may >> be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group >> will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. >> Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where >> the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the >> Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action >> taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this >> message.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! > -- Boo! Clipboard out!
