Wolves owner Steve Morgan says he wants Mick McCarthy to stay on as the club's manager even if they are relegated.
"You never give the dreaded vote of confidence but Mick has been here for five years and I don't believe you get any progress at all by chopping and changing," said Morgan. Steve Morgan - 18th May 2011 - trying to show how running a club as a business will work this time when it has failed every other time. On 14 February 2012 08:25, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> wrote: > Apart from Mick McCarthy. Ticks a lot of boxes. Experience in getting > teams promoted and keeping them up on a shoestring budget. He sounds like > our kind of man. > > > On 14 February 2012 08:14, Morris, Lee SGT <lee.mor...@defence.gov.au>wrote: > >> ** >> >> *UNCLASSIFIED* >> All the available managers are available because they have failed...its a >> funny old game. >> >> We've left it too late. >> >> *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of >> Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act >> 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to >> contact the sender and delete the email. >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >> Behalf Of *paul >> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 07:11 >> *To:* Nsw Wolves >> >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >> >> Never with Hughes Steve, my first choice was O'Neill. >> Sent via BlackBerry from Telstra >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> >> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com >> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:03:10 +1100 >> *To: *<nswolves@googlegroups.com> >> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com >> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >> >> Didn't you align yourself with Mark Hughes on a number of occasions? I >> hear he's doing rubbish at QPR, albeit with lots of money. >> >> >> On 14 February 2012 07:10, paul <pcr...@contechengineering.com> wrote: >> >>> Morgan will have someone lined up, just hope it is not Curbishley. I >>> would take Kevin Keegan until the end of the season! >>> Sent via BlackBerry from Telstra >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> >>> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Date: *Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:46:29 +1100 >>> *To: *<nswolves@googlegroups.com> >>> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >>> >>> does anyone think we'd have a chance of enticing Gus Poyet away from >>> Brighton? >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:43 PM, Paul Hart wrote: >>> >>> Make em put a shift in !!!! >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:40 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> >>> wrote: >>> >>> In reality though I don't think we're going to attract the type of >>> manager who wants to play "attractive" football. There simply aren't the >>> type of players in our squad to play that style. We need a manager who can >>> motivate grafters. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:37 PM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >>> >>> Has Dave Jones got himself another job yet? >>> >>> There's a Manager called Mark McGhee who gets good wraps at Bristol >>> Rovers. >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:24 PM, Paul Hart wrote: >>> >>> Sorry meant to say Graham turner >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:16 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Stuart Pearce? christ almighty, Bring back Mick!! >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:14 PM, Paul Hart wrote: >>> >>> Stuart Pearce >>> Alan curbishley >>> Grahame souness >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:11 PM, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I'd like to see if any of you are brave enough to put three >>> realistic names down as replacements >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:07 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> >>> wrote: >>> >>> He's GONE!!!!! >>> >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 22:04 , Steven Millward wrote: >>> >>> Clipboard in charge. Lol >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, "Jeremy Tonks" < <to...@hotkey.net.au> >>> to...@hotkey.net.au> wrote: >>> >>> Another sad watershed in my long Wolves hair shirt experience. I >>> watched this morning (and genuinely wished I hadnt). It is the first time I >>> have EVER watched Wolves and wished I hadnt.**** >>> >>> Frankly it was embarrassing. Hennessy was the stand out (and he had one >>> clanger). Johnston hopefully got an assist for one goal (hes in my fantasy >>> team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas?**** >>> >>> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the >>> first half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the second and >>> got absolutely flogged.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I dont care if we had >>> Tevez and Ronaldo up front theyd catch cold.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Im not for changing managers but I soon will be L**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com>nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: >>> nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM >>> *To:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com> >>> nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how >>> anyone can say we lack pace. >>> >>> I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of >>> the night has anything to do with it. >>> >>> Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing >>> isn't it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick and >>> Morgan said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it was >>> unrealistic to think we'd improve much. >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry < >>> <chant...@iinet.net.au><chant...@iinet.net.au> >>> chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:**** >>> >>> I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to >>> watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means >>> you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our >>> ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who >>> felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were >>> fighting amongst themselves.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there >>> would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress this >>> season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of progress so >>> people should be entitled to criticize.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line >>> with our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, even >>> if progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone**** >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward < >>> <millward....@gmail.com><millward....@gmail.com> >>> millward....@gmail.com> wrote:**** >>> >>> Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied >>> upon during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. >>> We thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this >>> year. So what?**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of >>> the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and >>> support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem >>> Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA >>> <<jpar...@munichre.com><jpar...@munichre.com> >>> jpar...@munichre.com> wrote:**** >>> >>> I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now.**** >>> >>> Really dont give a sh*t who replaces him: couldnt be any worse.**** >>> >>> Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com> >>> nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: >>> <nswolves@googlegroups.com><nswolves@googlegroups.com> >>> nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT >>> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM >>> *To:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com> >>> nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *UNCLASSIFIED***** >>> >>> A bit late.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of >>> Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act >>> 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to >>> contact the sender and delete the email.**** >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com> >>> nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: >>> <nswolves@googlegroups.com><nswolves@googlegroups.com> >>> nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry >>> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 >>> *To:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com> >>> nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** >>> >>> apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of >>> protest demanding Mick's head. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Should have been 6**** >>> >>> *From:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com> >>> nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: >>> <nswolves@googlegroups.com><nswolves@googlegroups.com> >>> nswolves@googlegroups.com]*On Behalf Of*Marcus Chantry >>> >>> *Sent:*Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM >>> *To:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com> >>> nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:*Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies >>> **** >>> >>> sorry, 5 at home.**** >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** >>> >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at >>> home?**** >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:**** >>> >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence >>> to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is >>> confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may >>> be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group >>> will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. >>> Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where >>> the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the >>> Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action >>> taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this >>> message.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out! >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out! >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out! >>> >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> > > -- Boo! Clipboard out!
