Greg Halford said on Twitter: "The lads will be delighted not to have to wear shin pads in training"
No wonder we get so many injuries On 14 February 2012 13:43, LEESE Matthew <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > They'll have spoken to someone already I'd imagine. I reckon these things > seldom happen without a succession plan already being in place. Hopefully > ours has gone beyond the 'Temporary Terry' stage. > > It'll be very interesting to see how much whoever comes in changes the > weekly team line up. McCarthy clearly has his favourites who he sticks by > religiously (eg Doyle playing at right mid with 2 players signed for this > position - Hunt and Hammill - sitting on the bench) and so I'm intrigued to > see whether a new manager sees value in the likes of Henry, Edwards and > Ward. Players like Milijas and Hammill who've been frozen out somewhat must > be delighted that they may get an opportunity to play football instead of > compete in a weekly stamina challenge. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 1:34 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > > E&S says Morgan has backed Curbishley > > On 14 February 2012 11:56, Steven Millward <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I tell you what I would love it if he called Keegan. >> Looooooovvvvvveeeeee eeet. >> >> >> On 14 February 2012 11:44, paul <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> No spin with me. Made a mistake with that post, simple as that. I do not >>> think Hughes would have been the right choice for us in hindsight. >>> Still hoping Morgan gives Keegan a call! >>> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Jeremy Tonks" <[email protected]> >>> *Sender: *[email protected] >>> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:40:01 +1100 >>> *To: *<[email protected]> >>> *ReplyTo: *[email protected] >>> *Subject: *RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >>> >>> Ouch! Looking liking a politician now Paul. Time to spin your way out.* >>> *** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 8:23 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Remember Paul, the NSWolves archive never forgets our mistakes. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Paul Crowe [email protected] via googlegroups.com >>> 23/12/2011**** >>> >>> to nswolves **** >>> >>> >>> Simple Jeremy, Mark Hughes, the best candidate available who is not >>> currently in a job. **** >>> >>> Can’t see the Board forking out millions to poach someone from >>> elsewhere. **** >>> >>> An outsider, who would change things dramatically, albeit what Dr. >>> Milward thinks, is Carlo Ancelotti. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *Paul CroweSales Manager - ***** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 14 February 2012 08:10, paul <[email protected]> wrote:** >>> ** >>> >>> Never with Hughes Steve, my first choice was O'Neill. **** >>> >>> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra**** >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From: *Steven Millward <[email protected]> **** >>> >>> *Sender: *[email protected] **** >>> >>> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:03:10 +1100**** >>> >>> *To: *<[email protected]>**** >>> >>> *ReplyTo: *[email protected] **** >>> >>> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Didn't you align yourself with Mark Hughes on a number of occasions? I >>> hear he's doing rubbish at QPR, albeit with lots of money.**** >>> >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 14 February 2012 07:10, paul <[email protected]> wrote:** >>> ** >>> >>> Morgan will have someone lined up, just hope it is not Curbishley. I >>> would take Kevin Keegan until the end of the season! **** >>> >>> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra**** >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From: *Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> **** >>> >>> *Sender: *[email protected] **** >>> >>> *Date: *Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:46:29 +1100**** >>> >>> *To: *<[email protected]>**** >>> >>> *ReplyTo: *[email protected] **** >>> >>> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> does anyone think we'd have a chance of enticing Gus Poyet away from >>> Brighton? **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:43 PM, Paul Hart wrote:**** >>> >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Make em put a shift in !!!! >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone**** >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:40 PM, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> In reality though I don't think we're going to attract the type of >>> manager who wants to play "attractive" football. There simply aren't the >>> type of players in our squad to play that style. We need a manager who can >>> motivate grafters. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:37 PM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** >>> >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Has Dave Jones got himself another job yet? **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> There's a Manager called Mark McGhee who gets good wraps at Bristol >>> Rovers.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:24 PM, Paul Hart wrote:**** >>> >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Sorry meant to say Graham turner >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone**** >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:16 PM, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> Stuart Pearce? christ almighty, Bring back Mick!! **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:14 PM, Paul Hart wrote:**** >>> >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Stuart Pearce**** >>> >>> Alan curbishley**** >>> >>> Grahame souness >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone**** >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:11 PM, Steven Millward <[email protected]> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> I'd like to see if any of you are brave enough to put three realistic >>> names down as replacements >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:07 PM, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> He's GONE!!!!! **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 22:04 , Steven Millward wrote:**** >>> >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Clipboard in charge. Lol >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, "Jeremy Tonks" <[email protected]> wrote:** >>> ** >>> >>> Another sad watershed in my long Wolves hair shirt experience. I >>> watched this morning (and genuinely wished I hadn’t). It is the first time >>> I have EVER watched Wolves and wished I hadn’t.**** >>> >>> Frankly it was embarrassing. Hennessy was the stand out (and he had one >>> clanger). Johnston hopefully got an assist for one goal (he’s in my >>> fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas?**** >>> >>> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the >>> first half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the second and >>> got absolutely flogged.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I don’t care if we had >>> Tevez and Ronaldo up front – they’d catch cold.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I’m not for changing managers – but I soon will be L**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how >>> anyone can say we lack pace. >>> >>> I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of >>> the night has anything to do with it. >>> >>> Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing >>> isn't it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick and >>> Morgan said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it was >>> unrealistic to think we'd improve much. >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote: >>> **** >>> >>> I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to >>> watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means >>> you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our >>> ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who >>> felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were >>> fighting amongst themselves.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there >>> would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress this >>> season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of progress so >>> people should be entitled to criticize. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line >>> with our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, even >>> if progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone**** >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward <[email protected]> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon >>> during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We >>> thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this >>> year. So what?**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of >>> the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and >>> support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem >>> Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA <[email protected]> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now.**** >>> >>> Really don’t give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse.**** >>> >>> Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >>> Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT >>> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *UNCLASSIFIED***** >>> >>> A bit late.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of >>> Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act >>> 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to >>> contact the sender and delete the email.**** >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >>> Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry >>> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** >>> >>> apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of >>> protest demanding Mick's head. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Should have been 6**** >>> >>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >>> Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry >>> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** >>> >>> sorry, 5 at home.**** >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at >>> home?**** >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence >>> to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is >>> confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may >>> be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group >>> will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. >>> Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where >>> the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the >>> Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action >>> taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this >>> message.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out! >>> >> >> > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! > > [image: Logo] > > Before printing, please consider the environment > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only > to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may > contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is > waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime > Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this > e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of > the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you > receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system > and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this > e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! > -- Boo! Clipboard out!
