Apart from Mick McCarthy.  Ticks a lot of boxes.  Experience in getting
teams promoted and keeping them up on a shoestring budget.  He sounds like
our kind of man.

On 14 February 2012 08:14, Morris, Lee SGT <lee.mor...@defence.gov.au>wrote:

> **
>
> *UNCLASSIFIED*
> All the available managers are available because they have failed...its a
> funny old game.
>
> We've left it too late.
>
> *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
> and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If
> you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the
> sender and delete the email.
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *paul
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 07:11
> *To:* Nsw Wolves
>
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
>  Never with Hughes Steve, my first choice was O'Neill.
> Sent via BlackBerry from Telstra
> ------------------------------
> *From: *Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com>
> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:03:10 +1100
> *To: *<nswolves@googlegroups.com>
> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> Didn't you align yourself with Mark Hughes on a number of occasions? I
> hear he's doing rubbish at QPR, albeit with lots of money.
>
>
>  On 14 February 2012 07:10, paul <pcr...@contechengineering.com> wrote:
>
>>  Morgan will have someone lined up, just hope it is not Curbishley. I
>> would take Kevin Keegan until the end of the season!
>> Sent via BlackBerry from Telstra
>> ------------------------------
>>  *From: *Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au>
>> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Date: *Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:46:29 +1100
>> *To: *<nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com
>>   *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>>
>> does anyone think we'd have a chance of enticing Gus Poyet away from
>> Brighton?
>>
>>
>>   On 13/02/2012, at 10:43 PM, Paul Hart wrote:
>>
>>   Make em put a shift in !!!!
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:40 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>   In reality though I don't think we're going to attract the type of
>> manager who wants to play "attractive" football. There simply aren't the
>> type of players in our squad to play that style. We need a manager who can
>> motivate grafters.
>>
>>
>>
>>   On 13/02/2012, at 10:37 PM, Marcus Chantry wrote:
>>
>>   Has Dave Jones got himself another job yet?
>>
>> There's a Manager called Mark McGhee who gets good wraps at Bristol
>> Rovers.
>>
>>
>>   On 13/02/2012, at 10:24 PM, Paul Hart wrote:
>>
>>   Sorry meant to say Graham turner
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:16 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>   Stuart Pearce? christ almighty, Bring back Mick!!
>>
>>
>>   On 13/02/2012, at 10:14 PM, Paul Hart wrote:
>>
>>   Stuart Pearce
>> Alan curbishley
>> Grahame souness
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:11 PM, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>    I'd like to see if any of you are brave enough to put three realistic
>> names down as replacements
>>
>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:07 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>  He's GONE!!!!!
>>
>>
>>
>>   On 13/02/2012, at 22:04 , Steven Millward wrote:
>>
>>   Clipboard in charge. Lol
>>
>> On 13/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, "Jeremy Tonks" < <to...@hotkey.net.au>
>> to...@hotkey.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>   Another sad watershed in my long Wolves hair shirt experience. I
>> watched this morning (and genuinely wished I hadnt). It is the first time I
>> have EVER watched Wolves and wished I hadnt.****
>>
>> Frankly it was embarrassing. Hennessy was the stand out (and he had one
>> clanger). Johnston hopefully got an assist for one goal (hes in my fantasy
>> team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas?****
>>
>> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the first
>> half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the second and got
>> absolutely flogged.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I dont care if we had
>> Tevez and Ronaldo up front theyd catch cold.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> Im not for changing managers but I soon will be L****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> *From:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com>nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:
>> nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward
>> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM
>> *To:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how anyone
>> can say we lack pace.
>>
>> I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of the
>> night has anything to do with it.
>>
>> Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing isn't
>> it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick and Morgan
>> said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it was
>> unrealistic to think we'd improve much.
>>
>>
>> ****
>>
>> On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry < 
>> <chant...@iinet.net.au><chant...@iinet.net.au>
>> chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:****
>>
>> I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to
>> watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means
>> you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our
>> ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who
>> felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were
>> fighting amongst themselves.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there
>> would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress this
>> season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of progress so
>> people should be entitled to criticize.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line
>> with our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, even
>> if progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone****
>>
>>
>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward < 
>> <millward....@gmail.com><millward....@gmail.com>
>> millward....@gmail.com> wrote:****
>>
>>   Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon
>> during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We
>> thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this year.
>> So what?****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of
>> the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and
>> support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem
>> Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> ****
>>
>>
>> ****
>>
>> On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA 
>> <<jpar...@munichre.com><jpar...@munichre.com>
>> jpar...@munichre.com> wrote:****
>>
>> I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now.****
>>
>> Really dont give a sh*t who replaces him: couldnt be any worse.****
>>
>> Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> ****
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> ****
>>
>> *From:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: 
>> <nswolves@googlegroups.com><nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT
>> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM
>> *To:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> *UNCLASSIFIED*****
>>
>> A bit late.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of
>> Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act
>> 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
>> contact the sender and delete the email.****
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: 
>> <nswolves@googlegroups.com><nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry
>> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34
>> *To:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies****
>>
>> apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of
>> protest demanding Mick's head. ****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. ****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> Should have been 6****
>>
>> *From:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto: 
>> <nswolves@googlegroups.com><nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> nswolves@googlegroups.com]*On Behalf Of*Marcus Chantry
>>
>> *Sent:*Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM
>> *To:* <nswolves@googlegroups.com> <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:*Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
>> ****
>>
>>   sorry, 5 at home.****
>>
>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:****
>>
>>
>>
>> ****
>>
>> so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at
>> home?****
>>
>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:****
>>
>>
>>
>> ****
>>
>> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence
>> to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly.****
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>>
>> ****
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is
>> confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may
>> be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group
>> will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects.
>> Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where
>> the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the
>> Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action
>> taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this
>> message.****
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>>
>>   --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.****
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Clipboard out!
>>
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>
> --
> Boo! Clipboard out!
>

-- 
Boo! Clipboard out!

Reply via email to