Drinking problem, probably. Gambling problem, never. Do we have a bet? Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
-----Original Message----- From: Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:15:12 To: <nswolves@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Bet time? I'm expecting Bates to khark it and new rich owners to take over after Mick starts. I think you have a drinking-gambling problem Paul. On 14 February 2012 21:07, paul <pcr...@contechengineering.com> wrote: > ** > Dream on! > Leeds wage bill is miniscule compared to us! But happy to bet a case of > beer on your predictions. > Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra > ------------------------------ > *From: * Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> > *Sender: * nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:14:25 +1100 > *To: *<nswolves@googlegroups.com> > *ReplyTo: * nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Bet time? > > Here's how I see it playing out. > > - New manager appointed who starts playing different players. > - Realises after a few games that the players on the fringe of the > team were no good after all and goes back to the original players that Mick > used to play. > - Wolves sink into the relegation zone and players start lining up a > move for next season having no loyalty to Morgan or the club anymore. > - Wolves get relegated and sell the best players, some to Mick who has > just got Leeds promoted via the playoffs. > - Manager has no idea or stomach for getting promotion on a limited > budget imposed by Morgan. > - Manager gets sacked in November with Wolves in the bottom half. > - Morgan starts taking money out of the club and then sells it on > whilst appointing and dismissing a range of different managers > - Wolves flirt with the bottom end of the division and eventually get > relegated after the new owners are shown to be insolvent > - Mick takes Leeds to a cup win. > > > > On 14 February 2012 19:47, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote: > >> Keep us up?**** >> >> I was actually hoping to finish top (Plan A scuppered if Manure and Citeh >> still have to play one another).**** >> >> Europe was a fall back position if we get any of the crap refs that >> plague the game.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Plan B now scuppered after Steve informed us the honeymoon period is 12 >> games. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >> Behalf Of *paul >> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 6:52 PM >> *To:* Nsw Wolves >> >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?**** >> >> ** ** >> >> I like your style Roger, best plan to keep us up I've heard!**** >> >> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra**** >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Rog & Reet" <rognr...@exemail.com.au> **** >> >> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com **** >> >> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:03:25 +1100**** >> >> *To: *<nswolves@googlegroups.com>**** >> >> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com **** >> >> *Subject: *RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?**** >> >> ** ** >> >> How long does the average honeymoon last?**** >> >> If it’s 6 games we should be almost in Europe with only two more managers. >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:57 PM >> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Yes you are allowed to slag him off now, although maybe you should show >> some magnamimity over a vanquished foe?**** >> >> **** >> >> I intend to criticize the new manager from day one, regardless of the >> facts.**** >> >> **** >> >> I did point out that new managers get a short honeymoon which is followed >> by a revertion to the previous position. The only problem is you have to >> sack your manager each season. Maybe it will work for us this season.*** >> * >> >> On 14 February 2012 15:44, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:* >> *** >> >> I was wondering if it's time to check out Steve's theory about wages. >> Anyone know what the odds are for us finishing 17th, meaning we'd match our >> wage bill? >> >> Who would be willing to stick a big bet on that before we appoint a new >> manager in support of the fact that the manager has no effect on the teams >> performance? I'm quite intrigued by Steve's theory now that Mick has gone. >> >> Also, now that Mick has gone am I allowed to slag him off again? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >> >> ** ** >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! > -- Boo! Clipboard out! -- Boo! Clipboard out!
