No, Im just going to enjoy being negative about everything On 14 February 2012 21:29, paul <pcr...@contechengineering.com> wrote:
> ** > Drinking problem, probably. Gambling problem, never. Do we have a bet? > Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra > ------------------------------ > *From: * Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> > *Sender: * nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:15:12 +1100 > *To: *<nswolves@googlegroups.com> > *ReplyTo: * nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Bet time? > > I'm expecting Bates to khark it and new rich owners to take over after > Mick starts. > > I think you have a drinking-gambling problem Paul. > > On 14 February 2012 21:07, paul <pcr...@contechengineering.com> wrote: > >> ** >> Dream on! >> Leeds wage bill is miniscule compared to us! But happy to bet a case of >> beer on your predictions. >> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra >> ------------------------------ >> *From: * Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> >> *Sender: * nswolves@googlegroups.com >> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:14:25 +1100 >> *To: *<nswolves@googlegroups.com> >> *ReplyTo: * nswolves@googlegroups.com >> *Subject: *Re: [NSWolves] Bet time? >> >> Here's how I see it playing out. >> >> - New manager appointed who starts playing different players. >> - Realises after a few games that the players on the fringe of the >> team were no good after all and goes back to the original players that >> Mick >> used to play. >> - Wolves sink into the relegation zone and players start lining up a >> move for next season having no loyalty to Morgan or the club anymore. >> - Wolves get relegated and sell the best players, some to Mick who >> has just got Leeds promoted via the playoffs. >> - Manager has no idea or stomach for getting promotion on a limited >> budget imposed by Morgan. >> - Manager gets sacked in November with Wolves in the bottom half. >> - Morgan starts taking money out of the club and then sells it on >> whilst appointing and dismissing a range of different managers >> - Wolves flirt with the bottom end of the division and eventually get >> relegated after the new owners are shown to be insolvent >> - Mick takes Leeds to a cup win. >> >> >> >> On 14 February 2012 19:47, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote: >> >>> Keep us up?**** >>> >>> I was actually hoping to finish top (Plan A scuppered if Manure and >>> Citeh still have to play one another).**** >>> >>> Europe was a fall back position if we get any of the crap refs that >>> plague the game.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Plan B now scuppered after Steve informed us the honeymoon period is 12 >>> games. **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>> Behalf Of *paul >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 6:52 PM >>> *To:* Nsw Wolves >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> I like your style Roger, best plan to keep us up I've heard!**** >>> >>> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra**** >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From: *"Rog & Reet" <rognr...@exemail.com.au> **** >>> >>> *Sender: *nswolves@googlegroups.com **** >>> >>> *Date: *Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:03:25 +1100**** >>> >>> *To: *<nswolves@googlegroups.com>**** >>> >>> *ReplyTo: *nswolves@googlegroups.com **** >>> >>> *Subject: *RE: [NSWolves] Bet time?**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> How long does the average honeymoon last?**** >>> >>> If it’s 6 games we should be almost in Europe with only two more >>> managers.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 3:57 PM >>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Bet time?**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Yes you are allowed to slag him off now, although maybe you should show >>> some magnamimity over a vanquished foe?**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I intend to criticize the new manager from day one, regardless of the >>> facts.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I did point out that new managers get a short honeymoon which is >>> followed by a revertion to the previous position. The only problem is you >>> have to sack your manager each season. Maybe it will work for us this >>> season.**** >>> >>> On 14 February 2012 15:44, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: >>> **** >>> >>> I was wondering if it's time to check out Steve's theory about wages. >>> Anyone know what the odds are for us finishing 17th, meaning we'd match our >>> wage bill? >>> >>> Who would be willing to stick a big bet on that before we appoint a new >>> manager in support of the fact that the manager has no effect on the teams >>> performance? I'm quite intrigued by Steve's theory now that Mick has gone. >>> >>> Also, now that Mick has gone am I allowed to slag him off again? >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Clipboard out! >>> >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! > -- Boo! Clipboard out!
