Is anyone else sensing the irony that for most of the season we've been arguing the point that managers have no impact/effect on the success or failure of a football club yet here we are now trying to blame our current predicament on the sacking of our manager.
Our wages dictate that we should finish 17th but that now seems unlikely. So I'm proposing that Moxey has been doing some creative accounting and that our wages are actually the lowest in the league. Either way, Mick was not and is not the answer to changing our fortunes for the better. Sent from my iPhone On 10/04/2012, at 12:59, Steven Millward <[email protected]> wrote: > There is a second question here, and that's was the money spent on players > and wages enough to survive in the Premier League for more than three > seasons? If yes, then it's McCarthy's fault, if he sanctioned every player. > If not then it's Morgan and Moxey's fault for not spending enough. There > have been quite a few players that have failed at Wolves in the Prem but they > were mostly small budget buys and the money was made up on selling on. > > Apparently it was in Johnson's contract that he be captain. I wonder if Mick > sanctioned that? Doesn't sound like the sort of thing he'd do, but more of a > Moxey move in the contract negotiations to save a few quid. > > I can't wait for Mick's autobiography to find out what really happened. I'm > sure there have been a lot of odd dealings. I still believe that we'd have > picked up more points under Mick, as the whole episode has been very > destabilising for the players. > > Was talking to a few friends on the weekend and every one of them thought it > was a bad move getting rid of Mick and that he'd built a good side on little > money. > > On 10 April 2012 11:49, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote: > But TC has simply demonstrated that the players brought in by McCarthy aren't > up to the task of playing I the premier league. TC is trying to flog a dead > horse that was of McCarthy's making. Mick had lost the ability to motivate > his troops to continue performing above their ability and by appointing > Johnson as the captain he effectively divided the team. Those actions are not > the hallmarks of a successful manager and we would still be in the same > position if mick were still here. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 10/04/2012, at 11:41, mark worrall <[email protected]> wrote: > >> NO >> >> At least we had a fighting chance then. Now it needs a miracle. >> >> Sad thing is, even if TC did miraculously keep us up, he'll still be pushed >> aside for a name manager next season regardless. >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> YES >> >> >> >> >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >> Of Steven Millward >> Sent: Tuesday, 10 April 2012 10:31 AM >> To: nswolves >> Subject: [NSWolves] Decision >> >> >> >> Everyone still happy with the decision to sack Mick? >> >> -- >> Boo! Curbishley out! >> >> >> CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is >> confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended >> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be >> unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will >> not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any >> views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the >> sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the >> Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action >> taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. >> -- >> Boo! Curbishley out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Curbishley out! > > -- > Boo! Curbishley out! > > -- > Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
