It's true. If you had hired Mick's equivalent in a normal business he would have been seen as a huge success. I wonder what the net outlay on players is compared to the value they have now? Jarvis and Kightly must have made Wolves ten million alone.
Time for a spreadsheet. I would have told him to get bent if I was Mick. You can't ask someone to sign an agreement like in return for their termination pay. Or was it an extra million pounds? On 10 April 2012 14:36, mark worrall <[email protected]> wrote: > Saw an interview with Moxey on weekend and he was saying that the players > at the club are worth 10 times what they were when MM arrived thanks to MM. > > And there wont be any tell all from MM. He was back at the club a couple > of weeks ago to sign his confidentiality contract in return for £1m. SM > learnt something from SJH. > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Steven Millward > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> There is a second question here, and that's was the money spent on >> players and wages enough to survive in the Premier League for more than >> three seasons? If yes, then it's McCarthy's fault, if he sanctioned every >> player. If not then it's Morgan and Moxey's fault for not spending >> enough. There have been quite a few players that have failed at Wolves in >> the Prem but they were mostly small budget buys and the money was made up >> on selling on. >> >> Apparently it was in Johnson's contract that he be captain. I wonder if >> Mick sanctioned that? Doesn't sound like the sort of thing he'd do, but >> more of a Moxey move in the contract negotiations to save a few quid. >> >> I can't wait for Mick's autobiography to find out what really happened. >> I'm sure there have been a lot of odd dealings. I still believe that we'd >> have picked up more points under Mick, as the whole episode has been very >> destabilising for the players. >> >> Was talking to a few friends on the weekend and every one of them thought >> it was a bad move getting rid of Mick and that he'd built a good side on >> little money. >> >> On 10 April 2012 11:49, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> But TC has simply demonstrated that the players brought in by McCarthy >>> aren't up to the task of playing I the premier league. TC is trying to flog >>> a dead horse that was of McCarthy's making. Mick had lost the ability to >>> motivate his troops to continue performing above their ability and by >>> appointing Johnson as the captain he effectively divided the team. Those >>> actions are not the hallmarks of a successful manager and we would still be >>> in the same position if mick were still here. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 10/04/2012, at 11:41, mark worrall <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> *NO* >>> >>> At least we had a fighting chance then. Now it needs a miracle. >>> >>> Sad thing is, even if TC did miraculously keep us up, he'll still be >>> pushed aside for a name manager next season regardless. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> YES**** >>>> >>>> ** ** >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> ** ** >>>> >>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 10 April 2012 10:31 AM >>>> *To:* nswolves >>>> *Subject:* [NSWolves] Decision**** >>>> >>>> ** ** >>>> >>>> Everyone still happy with the decision to sack Mick? **** >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Curbishley out!**** >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is >>>> confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>>> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may >>>> be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group >>>> will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. >>>> Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where >>>> the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the >>>> Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action >>>> taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this >>>> message. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Curbishley out! >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Curbishley out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Curbishley out! >>> >> >> -- >> Boo! Curbishley out! >> > > -- > Boo! Curbishley out! > -- Boo! Curbishley out!
