XP needs more horsepower to run than 2000. I run 2000 Pro on PCs with at least 233Mhz and 128 RAM and have tested XP on 350 Mhz OK. I run XP on the new 700 Mhz 128 RAM PCs here, which are my fastest (we are a public school). My older 700 Mhz 2000 Pro PCs will be upgraded to XP this summer when I reimage them. In my CADD lab I will probably go to 256 MEG RAM.
Users I have switched from 2000 to XP PCs have liked the new interface. I only wish XP had Explorer 5.5 instead of 6. Jeffrey Kessler MCSE MCP+I Technology Coordinator Newport (NH) School District 603-863-2414 ext 1116 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Giardina, dhr. N.(ICTS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:17 AM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: XP > > > > Hi guys, > > Does anyone can tell pro/con's > of implementing Windows/XP instead of Windows > 2000/Professional. That is in a Windows 2000 server based network > > Thanks > > Regards > ------ > Nico Giardina, > > > > > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
