ALWAYS?  How much do you want to wager on that?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin 
> Blackstone
> Sent: March 31, 2002 7:47 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Antivirus Strategy
> 
> 
> Agreed. Trend consistently outruns Mcafee and Norton and 
> ALWAYS beats them
> to the punch on AV updates.
> 
> One other bonus on Trend. I will automatically uninstall your 
> old AV SW for
> you when you install it.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 3:43 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Antivirus Strategy
> 
> 
> Take a good look at the offerings from Trend Micro 
> (www.antivirus.com).
> Their NeatSuite package is a complete gateway/e-mail/server/desktop AV
> solution and is attractively priced, but even better, the 
> products perform
> and are easily managed from a central web-based interface.  
> I've been using
> Trend for 3 years now and am consistently amazed at how 
> little effort I have
> to put in to administer it.  And Trend is almost always first 
> to the gate
> with updates when a new threat is identified.  Somedays there 
> are as many as
> 3-4 definition updates and I'm set to check for new ones hourly.
> 
> You can download the products and use them for 30 days.  
> Should you decide
> you don't like them (not likely), they uninstall very 
> cleanly.  Trend also
> offers academic pricing.  For quick ballpark prices go to 
> www.provantage.com
> and search for NeatSuite.
> 
> Roger Wright
> Southern Commerce Bank
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Kha Do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 1:35 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: Antivirus Strategy
> 
> 
> I know I'm about to start a huge fire here - 
> 
> It is pretty much in agreeance that for comprehensive 
> antivirus protection,
> you need scanning at the gateway, smtp, group mail and client 
> levels. I'd
> like to focus more on the clients here in this discussion, 
> but where other
> protection with suites ties in would be appropriate as well.
> 
> How do some of you enjoy / dislike the enterprise-management 
> features of
> your protection - mainly in relation to NAV Corporate, or 
> McAfee VirusScan /
> Netshield in conjunction with the ePolicy Orchestrator?
> 
> Right now some issues I have are that Symantec seems to 
> consistently be
> slower at releasing definitions than McAfee, but I have heard 
> better things
> about the Norton mangement console than about ePolicy Orchestrator.
> 
> We have a very hodge-podge defense right now - no gateway or 
> SMTP defense,
> Norton on Exchange (we also have a UNIX POP server that we 
> are migrating
> away from with no protection other than .procmailrc files), 
> and McAfee on
> the desktops and servers with no ePolicy management - and are 
> in the process
> of re-evaluating our entire overall strategy.  Our users are 
> 700 regular
> employees, faculty, and public lab workstations, and 1200 
> students in dorms
> that we cannot install software for.  We're also considering 
> eSafe Gateway,
> because it is so comprehensive and is cheaper than other 
> gateway solutions.
> Do some of you relax your client protection if you invest in fully
> comprehensive gateway protection??
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> -Alex
> 
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> 
> 
> 
> _______
> NOTICE:  The information contained in this electronic message 
> is considered
> privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 455.251 
> and 3905.017.  It
> is intended solely for the use of the recipient named above.  
> If the reader
> is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of the 
> contents of this
> message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
> message in error,
> please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original 
> message.  
> 
> 
> 
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> 
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> 

------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to