CA being the Acronym for ?
"Alexander Kha Do"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "NT 2000 Discussions"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: cc:
bounce-nt2000-203418@ls Subject: RE: Antivirus Strategy
.swynk.com
03/30/02 01:25 AM
Please respond to "NT
2000 Discussions"
John, I must agree with you there.
CA software installs perfectly every time, and ARCServe is so stable,
it's almost transparent on our servers =) It's NEVER taken down our
exchange server =).
Wes, so you use a good product like MIMESweeper at the Gateway level and
a crappy product like InnocuLAN at the client level?? Hmmm I guess if
you have a real acceptable use policy you can get away with that. We
can't really tell students and professors what they are and aren't
allowed to do.
-alex
-----Original Message-----
From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 1:00 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Antivirus Strategy
I love CA's ARCserve... It has never caused any problems. I have
always
gotten reliable backups with it. I have never had to work
nights/weekend
because the software sucks. I never have trouble with CA phone
support.
The CA website is so helpful too. Oh, the CA licensing stuff has never
cause any problem either. I just can never say how much I love CA
products....
~John
-----Original Message-----
From: Wes Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 3:53 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Antivirus Strategy
You may want to take a look at the eSafe discussion from yesterday.
We use CA InocuLAN and have been very happy with the product.
Distribution
works well and we have had no client related issues in the last year.
Hate CA.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Kha Do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:35 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: Antivirus Strategy
I know I'm about to start a huge fire here -
It is pretty much in agreeance that for comprehensive antivirus
protection,
you need scanning at the gateway, smtp, group mail and client levels.
I'd
like to focus more on the clients here in this discussion, but where
other
protection with suites ties in would be appropriate as well.
How do some of you enjoy / dislike the enterprise-management features of
your protection - mainly in relation to NAV Corporate, or McAfee
VirusScan /
Netshield in conjunction with the ePolicy Orchestrator?
Right now some issues I have are that Symantec seems to consistently be
slower at releasing definitions than McAfee, but I have heard better
things
about the Norton mangement console than about ePolicy Orchestrator.
We have a very hodge-podge defense right now - no gateway or SMTP
defense,
Norton on Exchange (we also have a UNIX POP server that we are migrating
away from with no protection other than .procmailrc files), and McAfee
on
the desktops and servers with no ePolicy management - and are in the
process
of re-evaluating our entire overall strategy. Our users are 700 regular
employees, faculty, and public lab workstations, and 1200 students in
dorms
that we cannot install software for. We're also considering eSafe
Gateway,
because it is so comprehensive and is cheaper than other gateway
solutions.
Do some of you relax your client protection if you invest in fully
comprehensive gateway protection??
Thanks in advance.
-Alex
------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person
responsible
for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you
have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination,
forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
