I would say that there are more people NOT in the CA camp then those that are in the CA camp. So, what you are reading here is a rare case.
It may be that CA is working fine for some...I personally have not been very happy with CA's products - Antivirus and Backup softwares. For those that can make it work....great job. I am glad someone is still supporting them...must have some people helping them pay the bills...just not me or my customers. Regards, Leonard Lee > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wes Owen > Sent: April 2, 2002 9:18 AM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Antivirus Strategy > > > Because it is CA. Seems like we have a some on here that > love them, but > there are a lot not of that camp. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:25 AM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Antivirus Strategy > > > > whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy shudder lol? > > > > > James Winzenz > > <James.Winzenz@peregrin To: "NT 2000 > Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > e.com> cc: > > Sent by: Subject: > RE: Antivirus > Strategy > bounce-nt2000-203418@ls > > .swynk.com > > > > > > 04/02/02 03:20 PM > > Please respond to "NT > > 2000 Discussions" > > > > > > > > > > <shudder> > Computer Associates > <shudder> > > There, I said it . . . > > James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ > Associate Systems Administrator > Peregrine Systems, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:02 AM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Antivirus Strategy > > > > CA being the Acronym for ? > > > > > "Alexander Kha Do" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "NT 2000 > Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: cc: > > bounce-nt2000-203418@ls Subject: RE: > Antivirus > Strategy > .swynk.com > > > > > > 03/30/02 01:25 AM > > Please respond to "NT > > 2000 Discussions" > > > > > > > > > > John, I must agree with you there. > > CA software installs perfectly every time, and ARCServe is so > stable, it's > almost transparent on our servers =) It's NEVER taken down > our exchange > server =). > > Wes, so you use a good product like MIMESweeper at the > Gateway level and a > crappy product like InnocuLAN at the client level?? Hmmm I > guess if you > have a real acceptable use policy you can get away with that. > We can't > really tell students and professors what they are and aren't > allowed to do. > > -alex > > -----Original Message----- > From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 1:00 PM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Antivirus Strategy > > > I love CA's ARCserve... It has never caused any problems. I > have always > gotten reliable backups with it. I have never had to work > nights/weekend > because the software sucks. I never have trouble with CA phone > support. > The CA website is so helpful too. Oh, the CA licensing stuff > has never > cause any problem either. I just can never say how much I love CA > products.... > > ~John > > -----Original Message----- > From: Wes Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 3:53 PM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Antivirus Strategy > > > You may want to take a look at the eSafe discussion from yesterday. > > We use CA InocuLAN and have been very happy with the product. > Distribution > works well and we have had no client related issues in the last year. > > Hate CA. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Kha Do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:35 PM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: Antivirus Strategy > > > I know I'm about to start a huge fire here - > > It is pretty much in agreeance that for comprehensive > antivirus protection, > you need scanning at the gateway, smtp, group mail and client > levels. I'd > like to focus more on the clients here in this discussion, > but where other > protection with suites ties in would be appropriate as well. > > How do some of you enjoy / dislike the enterprise-management > features of > your protection - mainly in relation to NAV Corporate, or > McAfee VirusScan / > Netshield in conjunction with the ePolicy Orchestrator? > > Right now some issues I have are that Symantec seems to > consistently be > slower at releasing definitions than McAfee, but I have heard > better things > about the Norton mangement console than about ePolicy Orchestrator. > > We have a very hodge-podge defense right now - no gateway or > SMTP defense, > Norton on Exchange (we also have a UNIX POP server that we > are migrating > away from with no protection other than .procmailrc files), > and McAfee on > the desktops and servers with no ePolicy management - and are > in the process > of re-evaluating our entire overall strategy. Our users are > 700 regular > employees, faculty, and public lab workstations, and 1200 > students in dorms > that we cannot install software for. We're also considering > eSafe Gateway, > because it is so comprehensive and is cheaper than other > gateway solutions. > Do some of you relax your client protection if you invest in fully > comprehensive gateway protection?? > > Thanks in advance. > -Alex > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to > whom they are > addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the > person responsible > for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be > advised that you > have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, > forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly > prohibited. > > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > > > > > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > > > > > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
