I'd make all the home shares hidden. Why would you need to browse home shares?
Browsing brings lots of interesting problems to the table, especially in a WAN environment. We map drives, via logon script, and our users don't have reason to do much browsing. Malcolm -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Kha Do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:18 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: Do hidden shares affect browsing? According to Q160807, Win95 has a hell of a time browsing or making a UNC connection if there are more that 1000 shares. Are hidden shares reported to the "list of shares?" So in part of this migration from Novell I'm working on, we need to move all the users' home directories. The 95 users need hidden shares I suppose. Anyone have problems with too many hidden shares? (Will be about 1200 on this server) ========================= Alex Do Desktop OS Specialist Information Technology Services x1428 ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
