From reading the KB article, I would answer your Q "Yes" - but I don't have experience with it first hand.
In addressing your scenario, I presume you have a folder on the server called USERS (or the like) and all user folders under it. You're using Novell to map to \\server\USERS\%USERNAME% right? And you want to make an NT share *for each user* ala \\NTServer\%USERNAME%$ ? Why? Hopefully I'm misunderstanding you. Set up ONE share: \\NTServer\USERS and use NTFS security underneath to allow access to the appropriate folders. With Win2K clients, you can map a drive to \\NTServer\USERS\%USERNAME% and your pre-Win2K clients, you simply map to \\NTServer\USERS and they'll have to manually open their folder. Then -- move to Win2K. :) Alexander Kha Do writes: > According to Q160807, Win95 has a hell of a time browsing or making a > UNC connection if there are more that 1000 shares. > Are hidden shares reported to the "list of shares?" > > So in part of this migration from Novell I'm working on, we need to move > all the users' home directories. The 95 users need hidden shares I > suppose. Anyone have problems with too many hidden shares? (Will be > about 1200 on this server) > > ========================= > Alex Do > Desktop OS Specialist > Information Technology Services > x1428 > > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > -- Todd Haugland -- The world is divided into people who -- think they are right. ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
