It kind of depends on what you need I used the NetApps f760.

Here is a good link :
http://www.netapp.com/products/filer/product_info.html

And if you are really interested shoot me a message directly and I can put
you in touch with some people there....



-Joshua






Joshua Morgan
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.profit-lab.com
http://ncontrol.info


-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Kha Do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:33 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Do hidden shares affect browsing?


oh cool, that's what you meant.  The last time I used NAS it was a Quantum
Snap server and it worked okay ... wasn't too impressed actually.  Any
models you recommend?  I've also used Maxtor MaxAttach and like I said, it
was okay.

-Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:16 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Do hidden shares affect browsing?


I understand that it's a browser issue...
The NetApps modify's what present back to the requesting machine so even
though you may have 1200 Home Directories you are only able to browse/see 1
of them






Joshua Morgan
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.profit-lab.com
http://ncontrol.info


-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Kha Do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:01 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Do hidden shares affect browsing?


It's a Windows 95 browser problem, although I was not aware of any server
limitation - 2KSP2 Server that is currently a DC (One of four). Anyone know
of any?

-----Original Message-----
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:57 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Do hidden shares affect browsing?


What's your Budget like?
 A lot of the NAS Devices (NetApps I know of)  have custom configs for home
directories with no limitations on shares.






Joshua Morgan
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.profit-lab.com
http://ncontrol.info


-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Kha Do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:48 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Do hidden shares affect browsing?


I wish it were that simple =).

No my problem here isn't Management, as everyone typically whines about.
It's that I work at a $$$$ liberal arts college where much of our users are
tenured faculty who don't like change and don't like being told what to do
on their computers (we can get away with this for the administrative staff).
You can't tell a PHD with poor vision that they just have to look for their
folder to save things in amongst 1199 other folders until they are due for
the hardware upgrade with new OS.

Anyhow, I can script creation of the shares and set proper NTFS permissions,
but just wondering whether having 1200 hidden shares will affect the problem
listed in Q160807.

Any other takers??

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:40 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: Re: Do hidden shares affect browsing?


 From reading the KB article, I would answer your Q "Yes" - but I don't have

experience with it first hand. 

In addressing your scenario, I presume you have a folder on the server 
called USERS (or the like) and all user folders under it.  You're using 
Novell to map to \\server\USERS\%USERNAME% right?  And you want to make an 
NT share *for each user* ala \\NTServer\%USERNAME%$ ?  Why?  Hopefully I'm 
misunderstanding you. 

Set up ONE share: \\NTServer\USERS and use NTFS security underneath to allow

access to the appropriate folders.  With Win2K clients, you can map a drive 
to \\NTServer\USERS\%USERNAME% and your pre-Win2K clients, you simply map to

\\NTServer\USERS and they'll have to manually open their folder. 

Then -- move to Win2K.  :) 

Alexander Kha Do writes: 

> According to Q160807, Win95 has a hell of a time browsing or making a 
> UNC connection if there are more that 1000 shares. Are hidden shares 
> reported to the "list of shares?"
> 
> So in part of this migration from Novell I'm working on, we need to
move
> all the users' home directories.  The 95 users need hidden shares I 
> suppose.  Anyone have problems with too many hidden shares?  (Will be 
> about 1200 on this server)
> 
> =========================
> Alex Do
> Desktop OS Specialist
> Information Technology Services
> x1428
> 
> 
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
 


>
 -- Todd Haugland
 -- The world is divided into people who
 -- think they are right. 

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to