Insulate?........Does not compute..... forgive me, I'm a technologist. :) what are you specifically trying to do?
The pdc will (should) be the master browser of the "subnet" it is on. Sound like you're a little unclear on one or both the following: 1. how the MS browser service works 2. ip subnetting. If that's the case then query technet for "understanding browsing", and query google for "ip subnetting", read up on each, then re-post your detailed rational and plan-of-attack. I'd recommend you have a more solid understanding of what's happening here before taking down your production network. byron -----Original Message----- From: /dev/null [mailto:dev.null@;beginthread.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:59 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: Re: Moving PDC behind firewall Thanks everyone for the info on this admittedly weird request. Everyone has asked why, here's the reason: > It's clear (to me at least)the "trusted" LAN is being redefined. We're wanting to insulate the PDC from the users. Ed Esgro said "PDC will run but it will not be the master browser for your 10.x.x.x network it will be the master browser for your 192.x.x.x network". If we put the PDC and user computers on the same logical (10.*) network with this firewall/router in-between the PDC and users and set the firewall/router to only forward the protocols we wanted, would this allow the PDC to be the master browser? I'm assuming the answer is yes. Thanks again for everyone's help. ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
