A - There are about 20+ servers (DCs,DHCP,IIS,SQL,E2K,SIM7,......) B - I guess what I'm looking for is the performance, management and downtime. I splitted the DCs into 2 V-Lan is because if one V-Lan is down, the AD still accessible on the network, but if I do this my concern is the replication or sychonization between the DC to other DC and servers on other V-Lan could fail later on due to switch problem. But If I keep everything on one V-Lan, thing would be faster and if the AD's gone we know the problem coming from one source. Again, I'm looking for opinion. Thanks!
TP -----Original Message----- From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 9:02 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Servers on one network segment A - How many servers are we talking about? B - What do you hope to achieve by the current arrangement or any new arrangements? ASB http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pham, Tuan Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 9:13 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: Servers on one network segment Hi- I'm looking for opinion from the group, I scatter my Windows 2000 Domain Controllers and all member servers across two subnets(V-LAN). There is no other devices on the the two except servers, I'm wondering if that is okay, or should I keep them all in one subnet? Thanks! TP ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
