Yes. ------------------------------------------------------ Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA
> -----Original Message----- > From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 10:39 AM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Servers on one network segment > > > Are you saying that I should keep all servers on one subnet then? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 9:35 AM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Servers on one network segment > > > I wouldn't split 20 servers. Too much overhead for too little > benefit, IMO. > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 10:14 AM > > To: NT 2000 Discussions > > Subject: RE: Servers on one network segment > > > > > > A - There are about 20+ servers (DCs,DHCP,IIS,SQL,E2K,SIM7,......) > > > > B - I guess what I'm looking for is the performance, management and > > downtime. I splitted the DCs into 2 V-Lan is because if one > > V-Lan is down, > > the AD still accessible on the network, but if I do this my > > concern is the > > replication or sychonization between the DC to other DC and > > servers on other > > V-Lan could fail later on due to switch problem. But If I > > keep everything > > on one V-Lan, thing would be faster and if the AD's gone we > > know the problem > > coming from one source. Again, I'm looking for opinion. Thanks! > > > > TP > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 9:02 AM > > To: NT 2000 Discussions > > Subject: RE: Servers on one network segment > > > > > > A - How many servers are we talking about? > > > > B - What do you hope to achieve by the current arrangement > or any new > > arrangements? > > > > > > ASB > > http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pham, Tuan > > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 9:13 AM > > To: NT 2000 Discussions > > Subject: Servers on one network segment > > > > > > Hi- > > > > I'm looking for opinion from the group, I scatter my Windows > > 2000 Domain > > Controllers and all member servers across two subnets(V-LAN). > > There is > > no other devices on the the two except servers, I'm > wondering if that > > is okay, or should I keep them all in one subnet? > > > > Thanks! > > > > TP > > > > > > ------ > > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > > > > ------ > > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > > > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
