Adam Lindsay wrote:
> \startmathcollection[default] %eventual patch for math-tex?
> \definemathcharacter [a] [nothing] [mi] ["61]
> \definemathcharacter [b] [nothing] [mi] ["62]
> \definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mi] ["63]
> \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mi] ["64]
> \definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mi] ["65]
...
Interesting. With these definitions in place, getting mixed bold in cmr
math is a lot better, too...
\definetypeface [] [mm] [bfmath] [computer-modern] [computer-modern]
\setupformulas [method=bold]
\starttext
\startformula
n({\bfm a} + {\bfm b}) = {\bfm \Gamma}
\stopformula
\stoptext
Now, do digits ever get bold-ed in mixed bold and regular math?
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lancaster University, InfoLab21 +44(0)1524/510.514
Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
