Am 2008-04-07 um 12:58 schrieb Mojca Miklavec: > To Hraban: encoding=uc has *zero* effect. To be honest - I doubt that > you will be able to extract any more than (theoretical limit of) 256 > glyphs from the Type1 font with XeTeX - character slots and font > glyphs are in one-to-one correlation, so I doubt that you can access > the glyphs outside of those 256 slots (unless you make tfm & map > files, but that's probably the reason why one wants to use XeTeX - to > get rid of that encoding mess). So: I guess that Latin-1 works, but > encoding=uc is ignored anyway.
Oh? I thought uc encoding would magically enhance my type1 fonts with full unicode range... ;-) Thanks for the clarification - I wasn't sure if I'd need "uc", but since it worked this way, I left it there. Greetlings from Lake Constance! Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer) ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________