On Monday 18 January 2010 13:50:25 Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Hi, > > views63 wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm using `` complex analysis'' the output is wrong. > > Not really. We (Hans and I) would say that it is now finally right. ;) > > > but using \ quotation (... ...) can output the correct quotation marks > > This is the right way to do it. Alternatively, you can use unicode > characters to input the correct quotation marks. > > Best wishes, > Taco
This is true of many standard TeX ligatures (is this the right word here?) such as ... (\ldots, \dots also works), << (\og), >> (\fg), "` (\glqq), "' (\grqq), ~ (unbreakable space), etc. This can be a bit disturbing for experienced TeX users. OK, \quotation{} is cleaner and of course using unicode characters may be even more readable, sometimes. I have very mixed feelings, as I know how to type ... but I never can recall the keyboard gymnastics necessary to get this in unicode. (Things are even worse on a Mac, as the standard keyboard layout is missing lots of important characters.) Alan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________