Giuseppe Bilotta writes:
> Tuesday, October 22, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote:
> HH> tex -> fmt
> HH> etec -> efmt (already)
> HH> pdftex -> pft
> HH> pdfetex -> epmt
> HH> omega -> oft
> HH> eomega -> eoft
> HH> nts -> nfmt (already)
> HH> but since pdftex is compatible is less urgent
> since it's efmt and nfmt, wouldn't consistency call for pfmt,
> ofmt, eofmt, pefmt ?
Yes, but thanks to the immense success of 8+3 filenames, they could
end up being truncated to pfm, ofm, eof, pef respectively. ofm is
known to collide with another suffix.
--
Olaf Weber
(This space left blank for technical reasons.)
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ref.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
