Thursday, October 24, 2002 Olaf Weber wrote: >> since it's efmt and nfmt, wouldn't consistency call for pfmt, >> ofmt, eofmt, pefmt ?
OW> Yes, but thanks to the immense success of 8+3 filenames, they could OW> end up being truncated to pfm, ofm, eof, pef respectively. ofm is OW> known to collide with another suffix. Are there Omega implementations for DOS? I mean, I think we should stop worrying about this. If an DOS implementation is indeed done, they can change it with no big problems. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ref.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
