At 06:48 PM 10/24/2002 +0200, you wrote:
Giuseppe Bilotta writes:
> Tuesday, October 22, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote:
> HH> tex -> fmt
> HH> etec -> efmt (already)
> HH> pdftex -> pft
> HH> pdfetex -> epmt
> HH> omega -> oft
> HH> eomega -> eoft
> HH> nts -> nfmt (already)
> HH> but since pdftex is compatible is less urgent
> since it's efmt and nfmt, wouldn't consistency call for pfmt,
> ofmt, eofmt, pefmt ?
Yes, but thanks to the immense success of 8+3 filenames, they could
end up being truncated to pfm, ofm, eof, pef respectively. ofm is
known to collide with another suffix.
ah, pfm is also taken already, (font metrics)
Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ref.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
