At 08:54 AM 10/25/2002 +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Thursday, October 24, 2002 Olaf Weber wrote:
>> since it's efmt and nfmt, wouldn't consistency call for pfmt,
>> ofmt, eofmt, pefmt ?
OW> Yes, but thanks to the immense success of 8+3 filenames, they could
OW> end up being truncated to pfm, ofm, eof, pef respectively. ofm is
OW> known to collide with another suffix.
Are there Omega implementations for DOS?
I mean, I think we should stop worrying about this. If an DOS
implementation is indeed done, they can change it with no big
problems.
Isn't that the djgpp variant? what does it do with suffixes?
Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ref.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
