http://luca.ntop.org/Ring.pdf
"Over 800 Kpps simply using a hacked Intel driver with an adaptive poll() algorithm without the RTIRQ patch." "Over 1.2 Mpps using a Xeon PC with a 64 bit Ethernet card." Gary ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debojyoti Dutta Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ntop] ideal pf_ring parameters for high speed capture Which doc are you referring to Debo On 4/17/07, Gary Gatten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Looks like they were doing > 1Mpps without "significant" loss... ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debojyoti Dutta Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ntop] ideal pf_ring parameters for high speed capture Thanks Gary, I can do 200K but not much more :( Everything is compiled properly Debo On 4/17/07, Gary Gatten < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: Did you read/follow this: http://www.ntop.org/PF_RING.html There are some white paper pdf's in there too with the details you are looking for. Sounds like 200Kpps shouldn't be much of an issue if everything is compiled and patched correctly. =========================================================================== "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system."
_______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
