Thanks. I can imagine that with a hacked driver. I guess there isnt much we can do with a stock driver.
Debo On 4/17/07, Gary Gatten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://luca.ntop.org/Ring.pdf "Over 800 Kpps simply using a hacked Intel driver with an adaptive poll() algorithm without the RTIRQ patch." "Over 1.2 Mpps using a Xeon PC with a 64 bit Ethernet card." Gary ------------------------------ *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Debojyoti Dutta *Sent:* Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:50 PM *To:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [Ntop] ideal pf_ring parameters for high speed capture Which doc are you referring to Debo On 4/17/07, *Gary Gatten* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Looks like they were doing > 1Mpps without "significant" loss… ------------------------------ *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Debojyoti Dutta *Sent:* Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:41 PM *To:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [Ntop] ideal pf_ring parameters for high speed capture Thanks Gary, I can do 200K but not much more :( Everything is compiled properly Debo
_______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
