Gray bar hotel, anyone?
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
<[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for "hoosegow". I have havent seen/heard that in ages. :-)
>
>
> --
> Espi
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:12 PM, John Matteson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Don't ask us to throw your bail when da'Judge tosses you in the hoosegow
>> for
>> failure to comply with discovery.
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> John M.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of David Lum
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 5:13 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] E-mail retention
>>
>> I thought this WAS corporate counsel! Who knew?
>>
>> Good advice, thanks!
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of Ben Scott
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 12:29 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] E-mail retention
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:05 PM, David Lum <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Given this:
>> >
>> > http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/doc/recmgmt/train/erm/emailman806.pdf
>> >
>> > Would it be the responsibility of the government entity to know the
>> > correct retention period for each message they receive? I'm trying to
>> > help a client determine how long e-mail should be kept, including the
>> > brick-level backups I have...
>>
>> This the NT system administration list. You want a lawyer.
>>
>> I'm dead serious. This is not an IT question, it's a law question.
>> Contact corporate counsel.
>>
>> -- Ben
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
