+1 for "hoosegow". I have havent seen/heard that in ages. :-)
-- Espi On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:12 PM, John Matteson <[email protected]>wrote: > Don't ask us to throw your bail when da'Judge tosses you in the hoosegow > for > failure to comply with discovery. > > :-) > > John M. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] > On Behalf Of David Lum > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 5:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] E-mail retention > > I thought this WAS corporate counsel! Who knew? > > Good advice, thanks! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] > On Behalf Of Ben Scott > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 12:29 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] E-mail retention > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:05 PM, David Lum <[email protected]> wrote: > > Given this: > > > > http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/doc/recmgmt/train/erm/emailman806.pdf > > > > Would it be the responsibility of the government entity to know the > > correct retention period for each message they receive? I'm trying to > > help a client determine how long e-mail should be kept, including the > > brick-level backups I have... > > This the NT system administration list. You want a lawyer. > > I'm dead serious. This is not an IT question, it's a law question. > Contact corporate counsel. > > -- Ben > > > > > > > >
