"Thar's a snake in my boots!"
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] E-mail retention +1 for "hoosegow". I have havent seen/heard that in ages. :-) -- Espi On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:12 PM, John Matteson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Don't ask us to throw your bail when da'Judge tosses you in the hoosegow for failure to comply with discovery. :-) John M. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of David Lum Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 5:13 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] E-mail retention I thought this WAS corporate counsel! Who knew? Good advice, thanks! -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Ben Scott Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 12:29 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] E-mail retention On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:05 PM, David Lum <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Given this: > > http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/doc/recmgmt/train/erm/emailman806.pdf > > Would it be the responsibility of the government entity to know the > correct retention period for each message they receive? I'm trying to > help a client determine how long e-mail should be kept, including the > brick-level backups I have... This the NT system administration list. You want a lawyer. I'm dead serious. This is not an IT question, it's a law question. Contact corporate counsel. -- Ben
