Definitely am looking into it.

Kurt

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Brian Desmond <[email protected]> wrote:
> You'd be surprised what it can do as far as telephony. You might want to look.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian Desmond
> [email protected]
>
> w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 7:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] A little afield of the normal topic - ShoreTel 
> installation
>
> Don't apologize - we have Lync 2010 in house, and are using it for IM and 
> videoconferencing between our offices.
>
> But I don't recall it being a full-blown substitute for a phone system like 
> ShoreTel, MiTel, etc. Oh, how I wish it were...
>
> Kurt
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Brian Desmond <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Any remedies for this kind of stupidity that you can recommend?
>>
>> Lync?
>>
>> Sorry ... couldn't resist.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brian Desmond
>> [email protected]
>>
>> w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 6:15 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] A little afield of the normal topic - ShoreTel
>> installation
>>
>> Any remedies for this kind of stupidity that you can recommend?
>>
>> Other than hunting down and hurting the devs?
>>
>> Kurt
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Webster <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I see mostly the same stupid requirements for most healthcare and finance 
>>> related software.  IOW, their devs are either too stupid or too lazy to 
>>> build proper Windows apps.  But that is just my rant from working so long 
>>> in the TS/RDS/XenApp world.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Webster
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>>>> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 6:01 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: [NTSysADM] A little afield of the normal topic - ShoreTel
>>>> installation
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> We are using ShoreTel for our phone solution. Works well.
>>>>
>>>> I have just recently upgraded from 10.2 to 11.2 to 12.3, after I
>>>> moved it to a new VLAN - that was a bit of a late night...
>>>>
>>>> However, it's running on an ancient SuperMicro server, on Server 2003 R2.
>>>>
>>>> It's time to move it to a new Dell machine, running 2008 R2, and to
>>>> get to the current version of 13.2.
>>>>
>>>> I've looked at the prerequisites for installing 12.3, and am
>>>> appalled at what they suggest, and was hoping for a bit of feedback
>>>> from anyone here regarding this.
>>>>
>>>> Here's what they want me to do:
>>>>
>>>> o- Turn off the firewall - disable all of the profiles (Domain,
>>>> Public and Private), then turn off and disable the service.
>>>> o- Turn off the Base Filtering Engine (disable the service)
>>>> o- Set DEP for essential Windows programs and services only
>>>> o- Turn off UAC
>>>> o- Do not apply patches released past a certain date, stating
>>>>           "When releasing a new build, ShoreTel publishes build
>>>> notes listing the Microsoft
>>>>           patches that are certified against the build.  ShoreTel
>>>> also highlights software
>>>>           changes required by the Microsoft patches. Note that no
>>>> additional Microsoft
>>>>           updates should be applied to your ShoreWare server between
>>>> ShoreTel builds. If
>>>>           you install Microsoft updates between ShoreTel builds,
>>>> they may have an adverse
>>>>           effect on your telephone system.
>>>>           Disable Microsoft updates until you review the detailed
>>>> certification provided with
>>>>           each release."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you are running ShoreTel, have you run into this, and how do you
>>>> protect your ShoreTel environment, other than firewalling the subnet that 
>>>> it's on?
>>>>
>>>> To me, this seems like egregiously broken software, requiring me to
>>>> reduce the security of the server to near zero.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Kurt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


Reply via email to