Got it.  You can do VM replication to another host natively with Hyper-V
2012, and it works a treat.  That wasn't an option in this case because I'm
not replicating this particular VM to our DR site.  I was just asking what
Damien meant by "clone the existing VM" without backup.


On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Daniel Chenault <[email protected]>wrote:

>   I was in that original discussion you referenced and have done the hot
> standby VM solution.
>
> There are a few products out there that can do this. The one I’ve hands-on
> time with is Zerto. It runs in the VMWare kernel and hooks into the file
> system. After the initial seeding it will then transmit all filesystem
> deltas to the target system hosting the standby (also running VMWare and
> using the VMWare API). It’s like RAID 1 for servers.
>
> If the fit hits the shan the standby can be spun up in the time it takes
> to start a VM (typically less then four minutes, varies) and, voila, your
> server is back up and running with data current to the last transmitted
> packet. This is what you’re calling a “hot clone.”
>
> That’s the 10,000 foot view.
>
>  *From:* Richard Stovall <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 11, 2013 10:26 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] In defense of image-based VM backups
>
>  Hot backups are definitely still part of the arsenal.  I was asking
> about hot-clones, which seem to be an implied possibility?  I don't know
> how to create one.  Damien, maybe this question is for you.  Is it possible
> to clone a running VM without going through the backup and restore
> process?  (I don't use any System Center products, if that helps.)
>
> Thanks,
> RS
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Jon Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Hot-backups were possible for Hyper-V under 2008, I only did them by
>> whole hardware backup and never tried to pull just the hot VMs.  I would
>> hope that has been improved.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:05:12 -0400
>> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] In defense of image-based VM backups
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>>  Perhaps.  This is in Hyper-V 2012.  I am still on the fat part of that
>> learning curve, so, perhaps.  Is there a way to do a hot-clone?
>>
>>  The restore to sandbox is a clone, it's just a new vm made from a
>> backup of the source.
>>
>>
>>  On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Damien Solodow <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  Couldn't you have just cloned the existing VM to make your sandbox; no
>> VM backup required?
>>
>>  DAMIEN SOLODOW
>> Systems Engineer
>> 317.447.6033 (office)
>> 317.447.6014 (fax)
>> HARRISON COLLEGE
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* [email protected] [[email protected]]
>> on behalf of Richard Stovall [[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 11, 2013 10:53 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* [NTSysADM] In defense of image-based VM backups
>>
>>   There was a discussion here a few weeks ago that centered on
>> image-based backups for entire VMs vs data-based backups of applications
>> only.  My recollection is that most of us smaller guys prefer (or at least
>> lean toward) the image-based variety, and the bigger, more mature orgs
>> prefer data backups.
>>
>> I'm going to offer an example of the utility of image-based backups for
>> small shops.
>>
>> My IT department consists of one other admin and me.  We support a fairly
>> complex IT environment for a company of our diminutive size.  We recently
>> went whole hog into MSCRM (on-premises), and our developers (we have more
>> of them than IT staff) are working hard to customize it to suit the
>> company's needs.
>>
>> Today I had to roll back a CRM org database to an earlier point in time
>> for the devs, and at first blush it appeared to be a successful endeavor.
>> Some funky issues arose, however, so I was faced with a difficult problem
>> and no clear direction on how to solve it.  (MSCRM is an enormous beast,
>> btw.)
>>
>> Long story short, having the ability to (almost) immediately spin up a
>> brand new, sandboxed copy of the CRM server allowed me to experiment and
>> figure out how to resolve the problem without touching the one the devs
>> actually use.  This helped me document the proper fix and apply it in their
>> environment in (literally) a few minutes.  I could not have done this
>> without the benefits of A) virtualization and B) the ability to create an
>> exact clone of the affected machine.
>>
>> There are lots of benefits to virtualization, and private clouds, and all
>> of the rest of the buzzwords currently on the IT bingo cards.  But, to me,
>> the greatest of these accrue to rank and file admins when confronted with
>> the kind of situation I faced today.
>>
>> It's really cool stuff that could not have been accomplished quickly
>> without virtualization *and* image-based backups.
>>
>> PS  Full disclosure.  I also do native SQL backups of the CRM databases
>> within the VMs, and the restoration of one of these in SQL Management
>> Studio was an integral part of the final solution.  I guess this is a
>> blended/hybrid solution, but it wouldn't have been easy without being able
>> to instantly create a sandbox to test in, and that's an example of the
>> power of image-based backups for the small IT shop.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to