For some reason that statement truly resonates with me: 

"I don't have the energy to be that paranoid"



Christopher Bodnar 
Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise 
Architecture and Engineering Services 
Tel 610-807-6459 
3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017 
[email protected] 




The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

www.guardianlife.com 







From:   "Matthew W. Ross" <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]
Date:   11/20/2013 05:11 PM
Subject:        Re: [NTSysADM] It's unlikely I will ever buy an LG Smart 
TV, but
Sent by:        [email protected]



The NSA has the power currently to record everything they can. And 
according to the leaked notes, they pretty much are. That means everything 
you put on the internet is suspect of being spied upon.

Google's traffic was being replicated between their own COLOs over their 
own dark fiber... So they thought they were safe. The leak in the security 
there was, apparently, the repeaters on said dark fiber. Thus, Google (and 
now apparently Yahoo as well) is now encrypting everything, even between 
their own servers. Not an easy task.

Is open source better? It makes it possible to prove that the program 
itself is secure. That doesn't make it better, just more transparent. 
There are (likely) many superior closed source and just as secure 
applications, it just can't be proved in the same fashion.

I use a Roku at home. And a Pogo Plug. And a ReadyNAS. And an XBox. And a 
"smart" JVC tv. Do I trust these guys to be behaving on my network, not 
secretly attempting to glean banking information and sending them to 
nefarious do-no-gooders? Yes, I do. But that's mostly because I don't have 
the energy to be that parinoid. I trust the wisdom of the crowds, and that 
people with interests in these matters will find the flaws in the system 
(like the LG TVs). I use good practices (Passwords and encryption on what 
I feel is valuable) and, otherwise, don't sweat the small stuff.


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


Jon D , 11/20/2013 1:06 PM:
Wow, this is good to know. 
Even though I don't break the law, I know the RIAA and MPIAA are sue happy 
and don't seem to care if they're suing the right person or not. I would 
rather avoid being in anyone's database.
+1 for XBMC. 
I think 2014 is going to be the year of open source. The only thing safe 
post 1983.
 
.
 


On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Ben Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> You assume I have *any* of those technologies.
>>>> I do not - and intend never to have them, for this very reason, and 
others.
>>>
>>>   A privacy paranoid posting from a Gmail address.  How ironic.  ;-)
>>
>> Not ironic. In this case, a cost/benefit analysis.
>
>   On this list, in the past, more than once, you've taken and held an
> absolute position in the face of several "cost/benefit"
> counter-arguments, and dismissed such arguments outright.
>
>   So... more irony.  :-)
>
>> Lies, and poor customer service - that's the crux of the matter.
>
>   Oh, I agree, completely.
>
>   But it's not like GOOG scores any better.


No, GOOG scores much better.

Kurt





-----------------------------------------
This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments.  Thank you.

<<image/jpeg>>

Reply via email to