SecureCRT is awesome. :)





*ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker>
*Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for
the SMB market...*



On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]>
wrote:

>  This isn't an area of expertise for me, but I have two clients using Van
> Dyke Software's VServe for Windows. It works well for them. I steered them
> in that direction, because I have nothing but good things to say about that
> company's SecureCRT.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Maglinger, Paul
> *Sent:* Friday, January 9, 2015 9:36 AM
> *To:* '[email protected]'
> *Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] RE: freeSSHd
>
>
>
> We're running Cygwin on another Windows server, it seemed to be a bear to
> set up and also acts flaky at times.
>
> For instance it seems that if one little thing can make the ssh service
> stop running, even something as simple as a client server reboot.
>
> I'm hoping for a simpler and more stable solution.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Rubens Almeida
> *Sent:* Friday, January 09, 2015 8:20 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] RE: freeSSHd
>
>
>
> Cygwin?
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From: *Maglinger, Paul <[email protected]>
> *Sent: *1/9/2015 12:07 PM
> *To: *New NT System Admin List ([email protected])
> <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *[NTSysADM] RE: freeSSHd
>
> Okay, if no one is using freeSSHd, what is everybody using for SSH on
> their Windows servers?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
> On Behalf Of Maglinger, Paul
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 5:32 PM
> To: New NT System Admin List ([email protected])
> Subject: [NTSysADM] freeSSHd
>
> Anyone using freeSSHd?  The only problems I've seen with it involved
> 1.2.6.  The latest version I've found is 1.2.7 and can't find any
> vulnerabilities or issues with it.
>
> -Paul
>
>
>

Reply via email to