As a former Drobo deployer, I strongly advise against their devices.  +1
for Synology.

--
Espi


On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:30 PM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've been providing offsite backup since '08 to my clients ranging from a
> few hundred MB's to a few TB's  on the higher end, and although I'm a tiny
> fish in the pond, I can tell you that 17tb (depending on file types and
> compression) can run  them into the tens of thousands per year.
>
> Even the big boys like Carbonite are about 2k per year for a 1TB-
>
> Of course there is always the argument of TCO associated with  using your
> own hardware and so on,  but if its for backup you dont NEED the latest
> 16core cpu's with 512GB of ram. Heck for a few grand I can build a 24TB
> box, or you can even buy prebuilt  24/36TB devices (Synology , Drobo etc)
>
>
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=24tb+server&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
>
> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=759605&gclid=CJmEzvz0j8MCFchr7AodjAYAyA&Q=&is=REG&A=details
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Backing up between main office and remote site
> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:50:39 -0700
>
> James, you make some good points.
>
>
>
> 1.       The initial idea would be to seed the backup device and then
> drive it to the remote office located 2 hours away. Then after setup the
> incremental backup should take over. I know restoring the data will take
> time if all of it is restored at one time. But breaking it down to
> individual servers or current data would help the restore process.
>
> 2.       Cloud storage right now is being considered because everyone
> seems to be talking about it. He mentioned cloud as an additional option.
> Currently thinking Microsoft's Azure.
>
> 3.       I don't think they have a DR process in place. But I think it is
> something they are considering because of this request. They may be
> thinking that with some of the servers being VMs they can be restored
> quickly. But like you said, can they get to the equipment to restore them?
>
> 4.       The current setup is unknown. If they agree to an assessment and
> inventory, I will have a good understanding of what is there. They will
> also. Since it didn't sound like they have something like that in place
> now. He mentioned how much trouble it was looking for accounts and
> passwords to change when the last IT guy just quit. And he's not sure he
> got all of them.
>
>
>
> Art DeKneef
>
> Avanti Computers
>
> Mesa, AZ
>
> 480-649-4430 Office
>
> 480-529-4430 Mobile
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *James Button
>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 4:08 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] Backing up between main office and remote site
>
>
>
> Not having done such corporate backups for a long while I am not going to
> suggest facilities, but pose some things to consider:
>
>
>
> 17TB is a high volume to run overnight backups on - so can you get away
> with just incrementals
>
> With a consolidation of the incremental saves as an after that - daily
> task.
>
> USB3 - SATA3? Drive speeds mean it will take ???days to just reload that
> 17TB using locally attached media
>
>
>
> Will cloud backup allow a reasonably fast restore /recovery of the
> operational environment
>
> Is that cloud backup secure and safe - as in who owns the facility, the
> datastore hardware and the links to that service provider's systems and
> then their datastore
>
> When (OK if) the datastore owner goes bust what happens to the drives
> containing your data, and to your data itself
>
>
>
> If using physical transport of backup media - avoid having the same
> transport vehicle do both the return of the old copies and the transport of
> the new - tends to lead to a shortcut where both copies are in the same
> location at the same time - as in your main location's car park.
>
>
>
> And ... what is the disaster recovery process ?
>
>
>
> Consider if there is a fire in the main server farm area and the building
> (partially) collapses
>
>
>
> 1 site I worked at found that the backup documentation, current backup
> storage devices and master passwords, recovery plan and authorisation codes
> - contacts etc. were in a safe in the middle of the building.
>
>
>
> That was noted by 'Management' when I finally managed to persuade them to
> do a proper disaster recovery exercise - On one long-holiday weekend,
> senior IT management stopped all IT staff from accessing the building with
> the statement - this building is not to accessed - now go and get the IT
> working again!
>
>
>
> The panic starts with - can you contact the appropriate people at the
> standby site - when you don't have their contact details!
>
>
>
> A 2 hour firesafe is not much good if there is heated concrete around it
> for a day, and then it takes several more days to get enough of that debris
> - concrete etc. moved to be able to extract the safes.
>
>
>
> (It was also discovered that the Halon suppressant system had not been
> filled)
>
>
>
> So I'd start with some requirements assessments - as in what is essential
> for the corporate front to the outer world
>
> Then some minimum time calculations.
>
> Also - having recreated your systems what processing  will be needed to
> achieve a new backup set from which your processes will be compatible with
> the restore process again
>
> As in will you need a full backup of the 17TB before you can go to just
> incremental saves again?
>
>
>
> Also - what is the exposure while having the Current  (only?) backup set
> in the same location as the server farm being rebuilt. - and maybe even
> attached to the same hardware driven from the same power supply
>
>
>
> I recently lost a system, OS drive, data drive & the drive the data was
> being backed-up to, - the PSU gave up!
>
> Then we found that the prior backup was not readable - probably due to
> problems with that PSU that had not become bad enough to be noticeable when
> that backup was being taken .
>
> Yes it was noticed when it smoked and the system stopped!
>
>
>
> JimB
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Art DeKneef
> *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 7:53 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [NTSysADM] Backing up between main office and remote site
>
>
>
> I am asking for feedback from those that backup between multiple sites.
> What were the good things and what would you do different? First time I've
> had to look at this in a very long time.
>
>
>
> Talked with a potential new client looking to backup up between the two
> offices and possibly cloud backup. Current data size is estimated at 17
> TBs. A disaster recovery type of thing. Besides have the backup local
> another copy is off-site.
>
>
>
> Main office has several Windows Server 2008 physical servers along with
> 15-20 virtual servers. They are running VM Ware (unknown version). Included
> in the mix is an Exchange Server (probably 2010), couple SQL Servers
> (unknown version), file and print and AD. The remote office has a few
> servers. Each site is on a fiber network but speed is unknown at this time.
> He is checking.
>
>
>
> Their previous IT guy just quit so they asked for a proposal to go in and
> document the network and implementing a remote backup solution. Right now
> we're focusing on this backup solution but I'm sure it will change as we
> get further into our discussions.
>
>
>
> I could use a couple of enterprise NAS devices or put in a couple of
> Server 2012 R2 servers as a storage and possibly turn on de-dup to reduce
> data transfer size.
>
>
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
>
>
> Art DeKneef
>
> Avanti Computers
>
> Mesa, AZ
>
> 480-649-4430 Office
>
> 480-529-4430 Mobile
>
>
>

Reply via email to