I wasn't advocating for any vendor in particular, just pointing out that with 
the falling prices of storage , he may want to consider running the numbers to 
see if the offsite is worth it.

Being that they have 2 locations already ,  seemingly in different parts of the 
state, PLUS,both with fiber- that in itself is half the battle (unless you're 
in an earthquake prone area that could potentially take out both locations 
heaven forbid) that could be a viable solution.

  



 


From: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:49:54 -0800
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Backing up between main office and remote site
To: [email protected]

As a former Drobo deployer, I strongly advise against their devices.  +1 for 
Synology.--
Espi
 

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:30 PM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote:



I've been providing offsite backup since '08 to my clients ranging from a few 
hundred MB's to a few TB's  on the higher end, and although I'm a tiny fish in 
the pond, I can tell you that 17tb (depending on file types and compression) 
can run  them into the tens of thousands per year.

Even the big boys like Carbonite are about 2k per year for a 1TB- 

Of course there is always the argument of TCO associated with  using your own 
hardware and so on,  but if its for backup you dont NEED the latest 16core 
cpu's with 512GB of ram. Heck for a few grand I can build a 24TB box, or you 
can even buy prebuilt  24/36TB devices (Synology , Drobo etc) 



https://www.google.com/search?q=24tb+server&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=759605&gclid=CJmEzvz0j8MCFchr7AodjAYAyA&Q=&is=REG&A=details


 


From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Backing up between main office and remote site
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:50:39 -0700

James, you make some good points.
 
1.       The initial idea would be to seed the backup device and then drive it 
to the remote office located 2 hours away. Then after setup the incremental 
backup should take over. I know restoring the data will take time if all of it 
is restored at one time. But breaking it down to individual servers or current 
data would help the restore process.
2.       Cloud storage right now is being considered because everyone seems to 
be talking about it. He mentioned cloud as an additional option. Currently 
thinking Microsoft’s Azure.
3.       I don’t think they have a DR process in place. But I think it is 
something they are considering because of this request. They may be thinking 
that with some of the servers being VMs they can be restored quickly. But like 
you said, can they get to the equipment to restore them?
4.       The current setup is unknown. If they agree to an assessment and 
inventory, I will have a good understanding of what is there. They will also. 
Since it didn’t sound like they have something like that in place now. He 
mentioned how much trouble it was looking for accounts and passwords to change 
when the last IT guy just quit. And he’s not sure he got all of them.
 
Art DeKneef
Avanti Computers
Mesa, AZ
480-649-4430 Office
480-529-4430 Mobile
 
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of James Button

Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 4:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Backing up between main office and remote site
 
Not having done such corporate backups for a long while I am not going to 
suggest facilities, but pose some things to consider:
 
17TB is a high volume to run overnight backups on – so can you get away with 
just incrementals 
With a consolidation of the incremental saves as an after that - daily task.
USB3 – SATA3? Drive speeds mean it will take ???days to just reload that 17TB 
using locally attached media 
 
Will cloud backup allow a reasonably fast restore /recovery of the operational 
environment
Is that cloud backup secure and safe – as in who owns the facility, the 
datastore hardware and the links to that service provider’s systems and then 
their datastore
When (OK if) the datastore owner goes bust what happens to the drives 
containing your data, and to your data itself
 
If using physical transport of backup media – avoid having the same transport 
vehicle do both the return of the old copies and the transport of the new – 
tends to lead to a shortcut where both copies are in the same location at the 
same time – as in your main location’s car park.
 
And … what is the disaster recovery process ?
 
Consider if there is a fire in the main server farm area and the building 
(partially) collapses
 
1 site I worked at found that the backup documentation, current backup storage 
devices and master passwords, recovery plan and authorisation codes – contacts 
etc. were in a safe in the middle of the building.
 
That was noted by ‘Management’ when I finally managed to persuade them to do a 
proper disaster recovery exercise – On one long-holiday weekend, senior IT 
management stopped all IT staff from accessing the building with the statement 
– this building is not to accessed – now go and get the IT working again!
 
The panic starts with – can you contact the appropriate people at the standby 
site – when you don’t have their contact details!
 
A 2 hour firesafe is not much good if there is heated concrete around it for a 
day, and then it takes several more days to get enough of that debris - 
concrete etc. moved to be able to extract the safes.
 
(It was also discovered that the Halon suppressant system had not been filled)
 
So I’d start with some requirements assessments – as in what is essential for 
the corporate front to the outer world 
Then some minimum time calculations.
Also – having recreated your systems what processing  will be needed to achieve 
a new backup set from which your processes will be compatible with the restore 
process again 
As in will you need a full backup of the 17TB before you can go to just 
incremental saves again? 
 
Also – what is the exposure while having the Current  (only?) backup set in the 
same location as the server farm being rebuilt. – and maybe even attached to 
the same hardware driven from the same power supply
 
I recently lost a system, OS drive, data drive & the drive the data was being 
backed-up to, - the PSU gave up!
Then we found that the prior backup was not readable – probably due to problems 
with that PSU that had not become bad enough to be noticeable when that backup 
was being taken .
Yes it was noticed when it smoked and the system stopped!
 
JimB
 
  
 
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Art DeKneef
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 7:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NTSysADM] Backing up between main office and remote site
 
I am asking for feedback from those that backup between multiple sites. What 
were the good things and what would you do different? First time I’ve had to 
look at this in a very long time. 
 
Talked with a potential new client looking to backup up between the two offices 
and possibly cloud backup. Current data size is estimated at 17 TBs. A disaster 
recovery type of thing. Besides have the backup local another copy is off-site.
 
Main office has several Windows Server 2008 physical servers along with 15-20 
virtual servers. They are running VM Ware (unknown version). Included in the 
mix is an Exchange Server (probably 2010), couple SQL Servers (unknown 
version), file and print and AD. The remote office has a few servers. Each site 
is on a fiber network but speed is unknown at this time. He is checking.
 
Their previous IT guy just quit so they asked for a proposal to go in and 
document the network and implementing a remote backup solution. Right now we’re 
focusing on this backup solution but I’m sure it will change as we get further 
into our discussions.
 
I could use a couple of enterprise NAS devices or put in a couple of Server 
2012 R2 servers as a storage and possibly turn on de-dup to reduce data 
transfer size.
 
Thanks for the help.
 
Art DeKneef
Avanti Computers
Mesa, AZ
480-649-4430 Office
480-529-4430 Mobile
 
                                          


                                          

Reply via email to