Got it in one, I don't. It's like the fact I hate VW Golfs, they may have loads of things people can reel off that are great, but I still can't stand them.
Anyway, I put "not so good" because aside from the fact I didn't like it, it was quickly superseded by 2003/XP. And putting AD as a feature really only applies to those running domains. I was speaking merely to a perception of it for "how people found it to use". And if that Metro-abortion is anything to go by, I'll hate that too. But I'll reserve judgement till after I get a chance to play with it and let my initial "where have things moved to" frustration pass by. Besides, moving on, I've said all I want to about this, it's all just my opinion, etc. , etc. On 8 March 2012 16:12, Steven M. Caesare <[email protected]> wrote: > Well now you can have mine weather you want them or not:**** > > ** ** > > - Vastly improved GUI (bye bye ProgMan & FileMan)**** > > - Plug-N-Play**** > > - Power Management (you can finally use this thing on a laptop)**** > > - AD**** > > - MMC**** > > - EFS**** > > - Dynamic Disks**** > > - Fat32 support**** > > - USB support**** > > - UDF support (DVDs!)**** > > - WFP**** > > - WMI**** > > - WDM introduced (Finally Win2K device driver development became an equal > citizen for developers)**** > > - Quotas**** > > -Legit DirectX**** > > - WSH**** > > - Group Policy**** > > -Offline Files**** > > -RDP/Terminal services in base edition**** > > -DFS**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > While each new version of Windows has a laundry-list of new features, and > there are a bunch of other ones in Win2K I didn’t list (MSMQ, etc…), that > subset I just listed are ones that made a significant tangible difference > in the experience to me…. Major improvements.**** > > ** ** > > And the thing was pretty darn fast and stable. Heck I ran betas 1-3 for a > year or better before release and they were pretty rock solid.**** > > ** ** > > I’d argue Win2K may have been the single most significant release since NT > was born.**** > > ** ** > > -sc**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Rankin, James R [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:46 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?**** > > ** ** > > I thought 2K was sh!t. I've had everyone else's thoughts on this already > though. But I still hate it. :-)**** > > ---Blackberried**** > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Steven M. Caesare" <[email protected]> **** > > *Date: *Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:40:08 -0500**** > > *To: *NT System Admin Issues<[email protected]>**** > > *ReplyTo: *"NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected] > >**** > > *Subject: *RE: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?**** > > ** ** > > > 2000 not so good**** > > ** ** > > Wait, what?**** > > ** ** > > -sc**** > > ** ** > > *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, March 05, 2012 3:22 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?**** > > ** ** > > Maybe everyone's just pensive because Microsoft have a habit of following > good OSes with bad. NT4 good - 2000 not so good - XP/2003 good - > Vista/Server 2008 pants - 7/Server 2008 R2 good - 8 ?**** > > On 5 March 2012 20:00, John Hornbuckle <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > As an enterprise, I’m very concerned about the learning curve, too.**** > > **** > > But at some point, you have to finally break away from the past even if it > involves a steep learning curve. The jump from DOS to Win3x required quite > a bit of retraining, as did the jump from Win3x to Win95. Both of those > were fairly radical moves, and things have stayed relatively static since > Win95 with the old familiar Start button in the lower-left corner.**** > > **** > > Maybe it’s time for a big shift.**** > > **** > > **** > > John**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* Dan Bartley [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, March 05, 2012 2:46 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?**** > > **** > > I have to say my initial reaction is good for tabs. Like John, I can’t > wait to see some of the new tablets. **** > > **** > > As for Enterprise, I don’t see Win8 making its mark if it stays the > current course. In fact I have a feeling it will go the way of Vista in the > Enterprise. It is too limiting and non-intuitive. It requires a complete > retraining for users and very few IT people have the time for that. The CP > also lacks some key domain support at the moment, such as in the printer > and file sharing areas, so maybe next version I will change my mind. Then > again, they really ditched the enterprise in Windows Phone in my opinion, > so maybe they won’t improve on that.**** > > **** > > Best Regards, > > Dan Bartley**** > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin**** > > > > > -- > "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into > the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able > rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such > a question." > > ****** IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER ***** > > This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is > addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed to > you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to > you. However, if the contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then > you probably were not the intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a > mindless cretin; either way, you should immediately kill yourself and > destroy your computer (not necessarily in that order). Once you have taken > this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use your computer, > because you just destroyed it, and possibly also committed suicide > afterwards, but I am starting to digress...... ***** > > *The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the > information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a > pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But > should you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it, > and please pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However, > if you pass them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding > liability for transmission.***** > > *In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then > please return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's > brother's wife wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will immediately > refund you exactly half of what you paid for the can of Whiskas you bought > when you went to Pets At Home yesterday. ***** > > *We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are > running Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy that can be. In the > event that you do get this message then please note that we take no > responsibility for that either. Nor will we accept any liability, tacit or > implied, for any damage you may or may not incur as a result of receiving, > or not, as the case may be, from time to time, notwithstanding all > liabilities implied or otherwise, ummm, hell, where was I...umm, no matter > what happens, it is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, OUR FAULT! ***** > > *The comments and opinions expressed herein are my own and NOT those of > my employer, who, if he knew I was sending emails and surfing the seamier > side of the Internet, would cut off my manhood and feed it to me for > afternoon tea. ***** > > ** ** > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin**** > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin**** > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin**** > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > -- "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ****** IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER ***** This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you. However, if the contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then you probably were not the intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a mindless cretin; either way, you should immediately kill yourself and destroy your computer (not necessarily in that order). Once you have taken this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use your computer, because you just destroyed it, and possibly also committed suicide afterwards, but I am starting to digress...... * * The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But should you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it, and please pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However, if you pass them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding liability for transmission. * * In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then please return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's brother's wife wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will immediately refund you exactly half of what you paid for the can of Whiskas you bought when you went to Pets** ** At Home yesterday. * * We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are running Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy that can be. In the event that you do get this message then please note that we take no responsibility for that either. Nor will we accept any liability, tacit or implied, for any damage you may or may not incur as a result of receiving, or not, as the case may be, from time to time, notwithstanding all liabilities implied or otherwise, ummm, hell, where was I...umm, no matter what happens, it is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, OUR FAULT! * * The comments and opinions expressed herein are my own and NOT those of my employer, who, if he knew I was sending emails and surfing the seamier side of the Internet, would cut off my manhood and feed it to me for afternoon tea. * ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
