Seems to me like a LOT of the issues then were timing. Didn't XP release like 
the day after most folks starting getting "comfortable" with 2K?  I didn't 
really like 2000.  Had too much NT for me, but that's just me.  I think I 
remember a lot of ANGST back then about MS cranking out OS's simply to build 
revenue.

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

Alright then.  I just think you'll find you're in the minority of people who 
think 2000 wasn't good or great.

As an aside, I remember when XP came out, people called it Windows Legos 
edition.  People moved to XP because MS stopped updating 2000 and it wasn't a 
bad upgrade, mainly a change in look and feel, unlike Vista, which created all 
kinds of headaches much beyond look and feel.




On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:19 AM, James Rankin 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Got it in one, I don't. It's like the fact I hate VW Golfs, they may have loads 
of things people can reel off that are great, but I still can't stand them.

Anyway, I put "not so good" because aside from the fact I didn't like it, it 
was quickly superseded by 2003/XP. And putting AD as a feature really only 
applies to those running domains. I was speaking merely to a perception of it 
for "how people found it to use".

And if that Metro-abortion is anything to go by, I'll hate that too. But I'll 
reserve judgement till after I get a chance to play with it and let my initial 
"where have things moved to" frustration pass by.

Besides, moving on, I've said all I want to about this, it's all just my 
opinion, etc. , etc.

On 8 March 2012 16:12, Steven M. Caesare 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Well now you can have mine weather you want them or not:

- Vastly improved GUI (bye bye ProgMan & FileMan)
- Plug-N-Play
- Power Management (you can finally use this thing on a laptop)
- AD
- MMC
- EFS
- Dynamic Disks
- Fat32 support
- USB support
- UDF support (DVDs!)
- WFP
- WMI
- WDM introduced (Finally Win2K device driver development became an equal 
citizen for developers)
- Quotas
-Legit DirectX
- WSH
- Group Policy
-Offline Files
-RDP/Terminal services in base edition
-DFS


While each new version of Windows has a laundry-list of new features, and there 
are a bunch of other ones in Win2K I didn't list (MSMQ, etc...),  that subset I 
just listed are ones that made a significant tangible difference in the 
experience to me.... Major improvements.

And the thing was pretty darn fast and stable. Heck I ran betas 1-3 for a year 
or better before release and they were pretty rock solid.

I'd argue Win2K may have been the single most significant release since NT was 
born.

-sc













From: Rankin, James R 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:46 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

I thought 2K was sh!t. I've had everyone else's thoughts on this already 
though. But I still hate it. :-)
---Blackberried
________________________________
From: "Steven M. Caesare" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:40:08 -0500
To: NT System Admin 
Issues<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
ReplyTo: "NT System Admin Issues" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

> 2000 not so good

Wait, what?

-sc

From: James Rankin 
[mailto:[email protected]]<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 3:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

Maybe everyone's just pensive because Microsoft have a habit of following good 
OSes with bad. NT4 good - 2000 not so good - XP/2003 good - Vista/Server 2008 
pants - 7/Server 2008 R2 good - 8 ?
On 5 March 2012 20:00, John Hornbuckle 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
As an enterprise, I'm very concerned about the learning curve, too.

But at some point, you have to finally break away from the past even if it 
involves a steep learning curve. The jump from DOS to Win3x required quite a 
bit of retraining, as did the jump from Win3x to Win95. Both of those were 
fairly radical moves, and things have stayed relatively static since Win95 with 
the old familiar Start button in the lower-left corner.

Maybe it's time for a big shift.


John





From: Dan Bartley 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 2:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?

I have to say my initial reaction is good for tabs. Like John, I can't wait to 
see some of the new tablets.

As for Enterprise, I don't see Win8 making its mark if it stays the current 
course. In fact I have a feeling it will go the way of Vista in the Enterprise. 
It is too limiting and non-intuitive. It requires a complete retraining for 
users and very few IT people have the time for that. The CP also lacks some key 
domain support at the moment, such as in the printer and file sharing areas, so 
maybe next version I will change my mind. Then again, they really ditched the 
enterprise in Windows Phone in my opinion, so maybe they won't improve on that.

Best Regards,

Dan Bartley

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



--
"On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the 
machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly 
to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question."

***** IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER *****

This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed. If 
you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and therefore 
you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you. However, if the 
contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then you probably were not the 
intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a mindless cretin; either way, 
you should immediately kill yourself and destroy your computer (not necessarily 
in that order). Once you have taken this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, 
you can't use your computer, because you just destroyed it, and possibly also 
committed suicide afterwards, but I am starting to digress......

The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the 
information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a 
pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But should 
you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it, and please 
pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However, if you pass 
them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding liability for 
transmission.

In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then please 
return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's brother's wife 
wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will immediately refund you exactly 
half of what you paid for the can of Whiskas you bought when you went to Pets 
At Home yesterday.

We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are running 
Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy that can be. In the event that you 
do get this message then please note that we take no responsibility for that 
either. Nor will we accept any liability, tacit or implied, for any damage you 
may or may not incur as a result of receiving, or not, as the case may be, from 
time to time, notwithstanding all liabilities implied or otherwise, ummm, hell, 
where was I...umm, no matter what happens, it is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, OUR 
FAULT!

The comments and opinions expressed herein are my own and NOT those of my 
employer, who, if he knew I was sending emails and surfing the seamier side of 
the Internet, would cut off my manhood and feed it to me for afternoon tea.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



--
"On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the 
machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly 
to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question."

***** IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER *****

This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is addressed. If 
you have received this message it was obviously addressed to you and therefore 
you can read it, even it we didn't mean to send it to you. However, if the 
contents of this email make no sense whatsoever then you probably were not the 
intended recipient, or, alternatively, you are a mindless cretin; either way, 
you should immediately kill yourself and destroy your computer (not necessarily 
in that order). Once you have taken this action, please contact us.. no, sorry, 
you can't use your computer, because you just destroyed it, and possibly also 
committed suicide afterwards, but I am starting to digress......

The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of the 
information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either way it's a 
pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to dwell on. But should 
you have nothing better to do, please feel free to ruminate on it, and please 
pass on any concrete conclusions should you find them. However, if you pass 
them on via email, be sure to include a disclaimer regarding liability for 
transmission.

In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, then please 
return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your mother's brother's wife 
wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we will immediately refund you exactly 
half of what you paid for the can of Whiskas you bought when you went to Pets 
At Home yesterday.

We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we are running 
Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy that can be. In the event that you 
do get this message then please note that we take no responsibility for that 
either. Nor will we accept any liability, tacit or implied, for any damage you 
may or may not incur as a result of receiving, or not, as the case may be, from 
time to time, notwithstanding all liabilities implied or otherwise, ummm, hell, 
where was I...umm, no matter what happens, it is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, OUR 
FAULT!

The comments and opinions expressed herein are my own and NOT those of my 
employer, who, if he knew I was sending emails and surfing the seamier side of 
the Internet, would cut off my manhood and feed it to me for afternoon tea.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to