LOL!!! That's whacked. 8)
-Bonnie -----Original Message----- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 8:51 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SAN vs. NAS, and all that - was: Re: Email Archiving Meet The Feebles... Heh. On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Don Ely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So now we're demeaning the Muppets?!?!?! Jeez, what is this world coming > to? > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> You sound like the Swedish chef from the Muppets. :) >> >> Shook >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 6:51 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: SAN vs. NAS, and all that - was: Re: Email Archiving >> >> In most of the environments I work in, NAS has more use for everything >> but >> Exchange DB and SQL DB. >> >> For those I prefer DAS. >> >> Then again, I work mainly with SMORGS, not LORGS. >> >> Regards, >> >> Michael B. Smith >> MCSE/Exchange MVP >> http://TheEssentialExchange.com >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 8:41 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: Re: SAN vs. NAS, and all that - was: Re: Email Archiving >> >> Understand that difference, but he stated a preference, and if he >> didn't simply misspeak (mistype?), I want to know the basis for the >> preference. >> >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Martin Blackstone >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > Keep it basic. >> > SAN - Block level access. Databases, Exchange, VMware, LUN. >> > NAS - File level access. Network sharing, CIFS. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 3:32 PM >> > To: NT System Admin Issues >> > Subject: SAN vs. NAS, and all that - was: Re: Email Archiving >> > >> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Michael B. Smith >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> However, given that (as always) you size your arrays properly, I >> really >> > like >> >> iscsi NAS. >> > >> > What benefit do you get from an iSCSI NAS, vs. an iSCSI SAN? >> > >> > I ask because we're looking at iSCSI SANs right now for our VMWare >> > infrastructure, and also for Exchange (2k3) archiving >> > >> > We're taking a close look at the Datacore software offering, and >> > Lefthand, though the Datacore looks better on long-term costs. >> > >> > Is there anyone here who can speak to Datacore offerings - I know >> > several of you are partisans of Lefthand? >> > >> > Kurt >> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
