One of my favorite Peter Jackson movies - I take it you've seen it? On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Miller Bonnie L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > LOL!!! That's whacked. > > 8) > > -Bonnie > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 8:51 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: SAN vs. NAS, and all that - was: Re: Email Archiving > > Meet The Feebles... > > Heh. > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Don Ely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So now we're demeaning the Muppets?!?!?! Jeez, what is this world coming >> to? >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> You sound like the Swedish chef from the Muppets. :) >>> >>> Shook >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 6:51 AM >>> To: NT System Admin Issues >>> Subject: RE: SAN vs. NAS, and all that - was: Re: Email Archiving >>> >>> In most of the environments I work in, NAS has more use for everything >>> but >>> Exchange DB and SQL DB. >>> >>> For those I prefer DAS. >>> >>> Then again, I work mainly with SMORGS, not LORGS. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Michael B. Smith >>> MCSE/Exchange MVP >>> http://TheEssentialExchange.com >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 8:41 PM >>> To: NT System Admin Issues >>> Subject: Re: SAN vs. NAS, and all that - was: Re: Email Archiving >>> >>> Understand that difference, but he stated a preference, and if he >>> didn't simply misspeak (mistype?), I want to know the basis for the >>> preference. >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Martin Blackstone >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> > Keep it basic. >>> > SAN - Block level access. Databases, Exchange, VMware, LUN. >>> > NAS - File level access. Network sharing, CIFS. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 3:32 PM >>> > To: NT System Admin Issues >>> > Subject: SAN vs. NAS, and all that - was: Re: Email Archiving >>> > >>> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Michael B. Smith >>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >> However, given that (as always) you size your arrays properly, I >>> really >>> > like >>> >> iscsi NAS. >>> > >>> > What benefit do you get from an iSCSI NAS, vs. an iSCSI SAN? >>> > >>> > I ask because we're looking at iSCSI SANs right now for our VMWare >>> > infrastructure, and also for Exchange (2k3) archiving >>> > >>> > We're taking a close look at the Datacore software offering, and >>> > Lefthand, though the Datacore looks better on long-term costs. >>> > >>> > Is there anyone here who can speak to Datacore offerings - I know >>> > several of you are partisans of Lefthand? >>> > >>> > Kurt >>> > > > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~ >
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
