If that's the case then would it be a problem with Exchange? Those databases 
are much bigger than 3-5GB.

 

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?

 

We don't use Vmware ESX for any databases above like 3-5GB, we usually put them 
on shared SQL systems, that are hardware and dedicated for SQL only. Just my 
recommendation. 

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA

Phone: 401-639-3505

________________________________

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?

 

How big are your databases Sherry, and how many folks are hitting them?

 

Dave

 

From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?

 

We've got about 14 SQL and/or other production database servers running in 
VMWare, plus 3 - 4 times that many for Dev/Test environments with no issues.  
We do have our main Siebel production servers running on physical servers, but 
all the periphery Siebel apps are virtual.  Some of the production SQL apps 
that we have virtual are Project Server, SharePoint, a POS app etc.  

On 7/22/08, John Hornbuckle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

It's a program to use in school libraries for checking books in and out. It 
uses an SQL database 
(http://www.fsc.follett.com/_files/fsc/secured/system_requirements/Dest%20School%20sys%20reqs%2010685A%20PDF%20print%207_08a%20(2).pdf)
 
<http://www.fsc.follett.com/_files/fsc/secured/system_requirements/Dest%20School%20sys%20reqs%2010685A%20PDF%20print%207_08a%20%282%29.pdf%29>
 .

 

We're a small district with small schools, and no app we've ever run on a 
server has  come anywhere close to fully utilizing the hardware. That's one of 
the reasons I want to virtualize more.

 

If the app will run on an XP "server" with a Pentium 4 processor, I can't 
imagine that it would be overly demanding. But they do say they require RAID 1 
or 5, so they must be counting on a fair amount of I/O activity. But I wonder, 
what exactly is "high" I/O when it comes to figuring out if something will run 
okay on a virtual server?

 

 

 

From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?

 

Why would a product not work on a virtual server, well, one that is high I/O, 
as in a database server would possibly not work.  What application specifically 
are you looking at that says this?  

We've used virtual servers for probably 5 years now, and we've always taken the 
approach that we will try it on a virtual server and if it doesn't work, then 
go to physical.  So far, we're doing really good with that approach.  99% of 
what we've tried on a virtual server has worked.  Now to counter that, we have 
always looked at what the application will be doing, evaluated the requirements 
and load, and made the decision on whether or not it's a good candidate for 
virtualization or not a good candidate for virtualization.   

Now with that said, I do have a caveat, I've never used Hyper-V and probably 
will never use it, we've been VMWare since we started with virtual server, 
first GSX now the latest release of ESX.  So, I can't say how Hyper-V utilizes 
system resources compared to ESX.....

On 7/22/08, John Hornbuckle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I was looking over the system requirements for a particular piece of
software we're looking at purchasing, and I noticed that it specifically
says it has to be on a physical (non-virtual) machine.

Now, this software doesn't have any special hardware requirements.
Processor requirements are modest, as are requirements for RAM and
storage space. And yet, the requirements explicitly say, "Microsoft
Windows Server 2008 Standard or Enterprise without Hyper-V" (if Server
2008 is the OS--it also supports Server 2003, XP, or Vista as the server
OS).

As I've mentioned before, I'm brand new to server virtualization. I'm
playing with Hyper-V right now for the first time. So, I'm sure I'm
missing something.

Why, exactly, would a product like this not work on a virtual server?




John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347

www.taylor.k12.fl.us


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~




-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." 
Arthur C. Clarke 

 




-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." 
Arthur C. Clarke 

 

 

 

 


***
The information in this e-mail is confidential and intended solely for the 
individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If you have received this e-mail 
in error please notify the sender by return e-mail delete this e-mail and 
refrain from any disclosure or action based on the information.
***

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to