Yes, our VMware based setup has some Windows 2003 servers some Linux
boxes, all the VMs themselves are licensed correctly.

 

What I couldn't tell from the page I was reading was whether the
additional license that MS refer to is meant for the OS *IN* the VM or
the ability to run more VMs (regardless of whether the OS in them is
Linux, windows, etc).

 

Olly

 

--

G2 Support

Online Backups 

 

Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

Web:    http://www.g2support.com <http://www.g2support.com> 

 

 

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 10 October 2008 13:51
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Hyper-V license question

 

The one physical and 4 virtual means he can have one 2008 host and 4 new
2008 Servers VM'd, simply changing a 2003 Server that's VM'd from VMWare
to Hyper-v should require no additional licenses other than the host OS.

 

If I understand the OP, the question was if moving a Windows server that
is VM'd from an ESX host to a 2008 Server host would require any
additional licensing other than the one 2008 Server Hyper-V host. 

 

Oliver?

David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER 
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764

From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 5:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Hyper-V license question

 

If you get 2008 Enterprise you get one physical and 4 virtual.  The
virtual license key are different than the Physical license key.

 

Jon

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Oliver Marshall
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

...or is it that each additional *windows* based VM requires an
additional license (which is fairy-nuff) and any NON-windows VMs don't
require a separate MS license?

I guess what I'm trying to work out is whether the ability to run
additional VMs requires an additional license or whether its the OS *IN*
the VM that requires an additional license.

Olly


-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 October 2008 13:16
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Hyper-V license question

Hi chaps,

I'm looking at porting some of our VMWare VMs to HyperV instead. We have
a new server running 2008 Standard. The MS licensing page for HyperV
says that I can run one VM server on the Standard edition and that
additional licenses are required for each VM.

Does that mean an additional 2008 Standard license is needed for each VM
or do they sell a separate VM license for additional VMs in 2008
Standard ?

Olly

--
G2 Support
Online Backups

Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:    http://www.g2support.com <http://www.g2support.com/> 



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to