...or is it that each additional *windows* based VM requires an additional license (which is fairy-nuff) and any NON-windows VMs don't require a separate MS license?
I guess what I'm trying to work out is whether the ability to run additional VMs requires an additional license or whether its the OS *IN* the VM that requires an additional license. Olly -----Original Message----- From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2008 13:16 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Hyper-V license question Hi chaps, I'm looking at porting some of our VMWare VMs to HyperV instead. We have a new server running 2008 Standard. The MS licensing page for HyperV says that I can run one VM server on the Standard edition and that additional licenses are required for each VM. Does that mean an additional 2008 Standard license is needed for each VM or do they sell a separate VM license for additional VMs in 2008 Standard ? Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.g2support.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
